2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-002-0233-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical factors affecting the brown-rot decay resistance of Scots pine heartwood

Abstract: The cell wall chemistry (amount of hemicellulose, a-cellulose, and total lignin) and the concentration of extractives (total acetone-soluble extractives, resin acids, pinosylvins and the total phenolics quantified as tannin acid equivalents) were studied in brown-rot resistant and susceptible juvenile heartwood of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). The study material consisted of a total of 18 trees from two 34-year-old progeny trials at Korpilahti and Kerimäki. The trees were selected from among 783 trees whos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not find correlation between lignin content and durability of spruce wood. This is in agreement with the previous study of Harju et al [34] where juvenile heartwood of 34-years-old Scots pine did not show any significant difference in the concentration of lignin between the decay resistant and susceptible trees. The authors assume that the concentration of total phenolics, acetone-soluble extractives and pinosylvin affected decay resistance of pine heartwood.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…We did not find correlation between lignin content and durability of spruce wood. This is in agreement with the previous study of Harju et al [34] where juvenile heartwood of 34-years-old Scots pine did not show any significant difference in the concentration of lignin between the decay resistant and susceptible trees. The authors assume that the concentration of total phenolics, acetone-soluble extractives and pinosylvin affected decay resistance of pine heartwood.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…These extracts include compounds that naturally protect wood from biological degradation (Toshiaki, 2001;Windeisen, Wegener, Lesnino, & Schumacher, 2002). There are many studies on this subject, and high of phenolic contents have been demonstrated to be effective in protection especially against brown rot fungi that destroy wood (Harju et al, 2003;Martínez-Inigo, Immerzeel, Gutierrez, Río, & Sierra-Alvarez, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a great variability in the yields of secondary phenolic metabolites between tree species, between parts of the trees, and even between individuals of different ages and botanical region (provenance) (Kähkönen et al 1999;Harju et al 2003;Willför et al 2003a, b, c;Venäläinen et al 2004;Hovelstad et al 2006;Välimaa et al 2007;Karppanen et al 2008;Sirén et al 2014). The total phenolic concentrations of 76.0, 17.5, and 1.1 mg/g in gallic acid equivalents for dried bark, needles and heartwood, respectively (Kähkönen et al 1999), and 6.7-13.6 mg/g in tannic acid equivalents for wood (Venäläinen et al 2004) of Scots pine (P. sylvestris) have been reported.…”
Section: Metabolites In Parts Of Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenolic extracts of Scots pine (P. sylvestris) and Norway spruce (P. abies) have been reported to exhibit antioxidative (Kähkönen et al 1999;Willför et al 2003a;Pietarinen et al 2006), antifungal (Harju et al 2003;Venäläinen et al 2004), and antibacterial activity (Välimaa et al 2007;Lindberg et al 2004;Rauha et al 2000;Vainio-Kaila et al 2017). A phloem extract (Rauha et al 2000) and a knotwood extract from Scots pine (P. sylvestris) (Berg 2014; Lindberg et al 2004) as well as a needle extract from Pinus massoniana (Feng et al 2010) have been shown to inhibit growth of several microorganisms, including bacteria and yeast.…”
Section: Phenolic Extractivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation