2002
DOI: 10.4141/a01-036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical composition, ruminal kinetic parameters, and nutrient digestibility of ammonia treated oat hulls

Abstract: . 2002. Chemical composition, ruminal kinetic parameters, and nutrient digestibility of ammonia treated oat hulls. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 82: 103-109. A study was conducted to determine the effects of ammoniation (3 or 5% by dry weight) on the nutritive value of oat hulls. Ruminal nutrient kinetic parameters and degradability of untreated and ammoniated oat hulls were determined using two non-lactating cows fitted with rumen cannulas. Eighteen steers were used in a digestibility trial to determine nutrient utiliza… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in dietary NDF, ADF, and lignin and the concomitant decrease in starch with HLP inclusion may partially explain this response. Digestibility of structural carbohydrates is less than for non-structural carbohydrates (Beauchemin et al 2001) especially for lignified by-products such as oat hulls (Thompson et al 2002), which were included at a rate of 12% (DM basis) in HLP. However, Marx et al (2000) also reported reduced DM digestibility for pelleted grain screenings (which accounted for 26% of HLP DM in the current study) relative to barley grain due to greater fibre content.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in dietary NDF, ADF, and lignin and the concomitant decrease in starch with HLP inclusion may partially explain this response. Digestibility of structural carbohydrates is less than for non-structural carbohydrates (Beauchemin et al 2001) especially for lignified by-products such as oat hulls (Thompson et al 2002), which were included at a rate of 12% (DM basis) in HLP. However, Marx et al (2000) also reported reduced DM digestibility for pelleted grain screenings (which accounted for 26% of HLP DM in the current study) relative to barley grain due to greater fibre content.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Note = “–”is not reported; “<”is less than [ 39 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 <...…”
Section: Substrate Type Selectionunclassified
“…Oat has a high hull content, which typically averages 250 g kg (1 dry matter (DM basis) of the kernel weight. The hull tends to be poorly digested due to its high acid detergent lignin content (55 to 60g kg (1 DM basis) (Thompson et al 2002). As a result, the net energy content for oat is lower (7.74 and 5.11 MJ kg (1 DM NE m and NE g , respectively) compared with barley (8.62 and 5.86 MJ kg (1 DM NE m and NE g , respectively) [National Research Council (NRC) 1996].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%