1988
DOI: 10.1097/00010694-198808000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical Composition of the Organic Matter in Forest Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Trumbore et al (1996) combined density separation with hydrolysis to separate bulk SOM into three pools with increasing mean residence times based on 14 C analysis: a low-density (<2.0 g cm À3 ) fraction with rapid turnover; a high-density hydrolyzable fraction with intermediate turnover; and a highdensity nonhydrolyzable fraction with very slow turnover times. Kogel-Knabner (2002) stressed that conventional chemical degradative techniques, such as those used to produce Table 2, can only account for 50-60% of the total organic material in plant litter and SOM (Kogel et al, 1988) and that these methods are often not specific for single compound classes (Preston et al, 1998;Ryan et al, 1990). Although these conventional chemical techniques have limitations, the majority of decomposition studies have relied on them.…”
Section: Soil Organic Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trumbore et al (1996) combined density separation with hydrolysis to separate bulk SOM into three pools with increasing mean residence times based on 14 C analysis: a low-density (<2.0 g cm À3 ) fraction with rapid turnover; a high-density hydrolyzable fraction with intermediate turnover; and a highdensity nonhydrolyzable fraction with very slow turnover times. Kogel-Knabner (2002) stressed that conventional chemical degradative techniques, such as those used to produce Table 2, can only account for 50-60% of the total organic material in plant litter and SOM (Kogel et al, 1988) and that these methods are often not specific for single compound classes (Preston et al, 1998;Ryan et al, 1990). Although these conventional chemical techniques have limitations, the majority of decomposition studies have relied on them.…”
Section: Soil Organic Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies of forest soils have demonstrated the efficacy of two modern techniques, pyrolysisfield ionization mass spectrometry (Py-FIMS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy for characterization of organic matter and elucidation of decomposition pathways (Beudert et al, 1989;Hempfling and Schulten, 1990;Hempfling et al, 1987K6gel et al, 1988;K6gel-Knabner et al, 1988K6gel-Knabner et al, , 1991Krosshavn et al, 1992;Post et al, 1988;Zech et al, 1992). While they represent a great advance in our understanding of forest soil organic matter, they have had a narrow emphasis on sites of northern Europe, and for most part, the litter and humus horizons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass spectrometric method which we used for sugars has been previously reported by Schulten (1984) and Kögel et al (1988). The following mass signals were used for hexoses: m/z 126, 144, and 162; for pentoses: m/z 114 and 132; and for polysacchrides: m/z 60, 72, 82, 84, 96, 98, 110, and 112.…”
Section: Analysis Of Sugars and Polysaccharidesmentioning
confidence: 99%