2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2008.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical composition and methane yield of maize hybrids with contrasting maturity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
41
2
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
13
41
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The chemical composition of maize silage was typical for the substrate and was similar to the results of other studies (Schittenhelm 2008;Negri et al 2014). The goldenrod herb was characterized by higher TS but displayed lower VS than maize silage.…”
Section: Chemical Compositionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The chemical composition of maize silage was typical for the substrate and was similar to the results of other studies (Schittenhelm 2008;Negri et al 2014). The goldenrod herb was characterized by higher TS but displayed lower VS than maize silage.…”
Section: Chemical Compositionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Moreover, cultivation and ensiling techniques are well known by farmers [7,8]. Further, silage maize is suitable for continuous cultivation due to its self-compatibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Schittenhelm (2008) reported that despite substantially different nutrient concentration among some maize hybrids used in a trial, no clear-cut association existed between chemical composition and specific methane yield. This variation could be due to variation in chemical content within critical limits to affect BMP.…”
Section: A Gronomic Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%