2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10310-005-0162-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical components of hardwood barks stripped by the alien squirrel Callosciurus erythraeus in Japan

Abstract: The Pallas squirrel (Callosciurus erythraeus; common name in Japan: Formosan squirrel) was introduced in the 1950s and has established populations throughout southeastern Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan. Some tree species in natural forests, parks, and gardens in residential areas have been intensively debarked by the squirrels, especially in winter and spring. The amounts of chemical components, such as polyphenols, resins, flavanols, and sugars, in the bark were compared among species and individual trees collect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, any preferences for higher carbohydrate levels in consumed bark previously reported (e.g. Faber 1996, Reynolds et al 1998, Tamura & Ohara 2005 should be interpreted cautiously since when measured at the time of stripping, the chemical composition of the bark may not differ between stripped and nonstripped beeches. Several previous studies (Randveer & Heikkila¨1996, Tamura & Ohara 2005, Kuiters et al 2006) also failed to identify any specificity in the composition of bark stripped trees, comparing trees within or among species (but see Welch et al 1997 for a selection of Sitka spruce by deer according to stem girth).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hence, any preferences for higher carbohydrate levels in consumed bark previously reported (e.g. Faber 1996, Reynolds et al 1998, Tamura & Ohara 2005 should be interpreted cautiously since when measured at the time of stripping, the chemical composition of the bark may not differ between stripped and nonstripped beeches. Several previous studies (Randveer & Heikkila¨1996, Tamura & Ohara 2005, Kuiters et al 2006) also failed to identify any specificity in the composition of bark stripped trees, comparing trees within or among species (but see Welch et al 1997 for a selection of Sitka spruce by deer according to stem girth).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Myosciurus pumilio feed continuously on scrapings from the surface of chips pulled from the outer barks of large trees (Emmons, 1980). Similarly, C. erythraeus is known to frequently debark trees to feed on sap, occasionally causing severe damage to forests (Kuo, 1985;Sonoda et al, 2001;Tamura & Ohara, 2005;Hori, Yamada & Tsunoda, 2006). Because the anterior deep masseter is an important contributor to the power stroke of incision (Druzinsky, 1995), we suggest that the leverage increase of the anterior masseter provides an advantage for C. erythraeus to forcefully bite into bark with its anterior dentition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, C. erythraeus frequently forages on the hard seeds of Pinus, Camellia and Castanopsis trees (Chou et al, 1985;Sonoda et al, 2001;Lu, 2003;Men et al, 2007). Callosciurus erythraeus also occasionally strips tough bark with the incisors to acquire sugar from sweet tree saps (Tamura & Ohara, 2005), whereas this behavior seems to be rare or not so important in the sympatric D. rufigenis (Medway, 1969;Nowak, 1999;Smith & Xie, 2008). Although seeds are a high-quality food providing a rich source of carbohydrate and protein (Waterman & Kool, 1994), they are often protected by hard shells composed of highly dense cell walls, which make them mechanically resistant against fracture (Lucas et al, 2000;Lucas, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Gill (1992a, b) reviewed damage by deer, squirrels, rabbits, hares, voles, and edible dormice in north temperate forests. Studies of damage by mammals have included studies of economic damage to forest plantations (Akashi and Terazawa 2005), forest ecosystems (Vehviläinen and Koricheva 2006), and chemical defense against mammalian browsing (Bryant et al 1989;Tamura and Ohara 2005), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%