2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.02.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical compatibility between UO 2 fuel and SiC cladding for LWRs. Application to ATF (Accident-Tolerant Fuels)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, concepts for this long-term solution are less mature. We can cite advanced and promising works on SiC-SiC composites [2][3][4][5][6], monolithic SiC tubes [7] and free-standing Mo claddings [8] by CVD (Chemical Vapor Deposition).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, concepts for this long-term solution are less mature. We can cite advanced and promising works on SiC-SiC composites [2][3][4][5][6], monolithic SiC tubes [7] and free-standing Mo claddings [8] by CVD (Chemical Vapor Deposition).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the Fukushima accident in Japan, accident‐tolerant fuels drew attention. Braun et al have recently reported KEMS studies on the chemical compatibility of UO 2 fuel and an SiC coating 309 …”
Section: Novel Applications Of Kemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commonality between the above and other approaches to composite monolithic fuel forms is that processing occurs conventionally after the secondary phase is introduced to the primary phase through mixing in a powder form. However, SPS of UO 2 -SiC composites is a partial exception, as sintering of UO 2 containing SiC using conventional temperatures and times would result in a catastrophic reaction [26]. Even in this case, distribution of the inert secondary phase is random.…”
Section: Heterogeneous Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%