2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical characterization of atmospheric particles and source apportionment in the vicinity of a steelmaking industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…4, the mean EFs of Ca, Ba, K, Mn, V and Cr are below 10, which suggest that these elements would be more likely originated from natural sources such as crustal soil and re-suspended soil and have no obvious enrichment in particle matter (Xu et al, 2013b). It is worth to notice for K the 90% percentage is over 10, and there are outliers over 10, and K is associated to biomass burning as reported in many other studies (e.g., Hleis et al, 2013;Almeida et al, 2015). Zn has different range of enrichment factor with the mean of 164.46 (Fig.…”
Section: Enrichment Factormentioning
confidence: 68%
“…4, the mean EFs of Ca, Ba, K, Mn, V and Cr are below 10, which suggest that these elements would be more likely originated from natural sources such as crustal soil and re-suspended soil and have no obvious enrichment in particle matter (Xu et al, 2013b). It is worth to notice for K the 90% percentage is over 10, and there are outliers over 10, and K is associated to biomass burning as reported in many other studies (e.g., Hleis et al, 2013;Almeida et al, 2015). Zn has different range of enrichment factor with the mean of 164.46 (Fig.…”
Section: Enrichment Factormentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The contribution proportions of factor 4 to PM 2.5 increased from 26.2 % (51.7 µg m −3 ) during the WY, 28.0 % (63.2 µg m −3 ) during the NCANHP, and 29.5 % (84.0 µg m −3 ) during the NCAHP to 31.7 % (85.2 µg m −3 ) during the CAHP, and lightly increased to 32.6 % (96.3 µg m −3 ) during the ACA. Factor 5 was identified as industrial emissions, with high loadings of Cr (66.7 %), Cu (63.7 %), Fe (83.2 %), Mn (51.3 %), Ti (70.0 %), Zn (69.2 %), Pb (42.1 %), and Cl − (41.0 %) (Morishita et al, 2011;Mansha et al, 2012;Almeida et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2016;Yao et al, 2016). The contribution proportions of factor 5 to PM 2.5 ranged from 5.0 % (11.3 µg m −3 ) during the NCANHP and 5.1 % (10.0 µg m −3 ) during the WY to 5.9 % (16.7 µg m −3 ) during the NCAHP, and decreased to 5.3 % (14.2 µg m −3 ) during the CAHP and 4.9 % (14.4 µg m −3 ) during the ACA.…”
Section: Variations In Pm 25 Source Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study source apportionment was performed using positive matrix factorization (PMF)-EPA-PMF 3.0 [24], which was developed by Paatero [25]. PMF can decompose the data matrix into two sub-data matrixes-the factor profiles and factor contributions without detailed prior knowledge on source inventories [26]. Moreover, non-negative constrains are implemented in order to obtain more physically explainable factors [22].…”
Section: Source Apportionmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data below the limit of quantification (LOQ) were replaced by half of the LOQ and the uncertainties were set to 5/6 the LOQ. Missing data were replaced by geometric mean of the measured values and their accompanying uncertainties were set as four times these geometric mean values [26].…”
Section: Source Apportionmentmentioning
confidence: 99%