“…As originally defined, with subsequent modification, a pollination syndrome consists of a group of functionally related floral characters and behaviors that collectively are consistent with pollination by a similarly distinctive functional taxonomic group of animals that have convergent feeding strategies, functionally similar mouthpart types or foraging behaviors that access floral rewards in the same way. Floral rewards typically are nectar and pollen, but also include oils, resins, mating sites, warm resting places, and other less obvious attributes (Baker & Baker, 1979;Pellmyr & Thien, 1986;Haslett, 1989a;Thien et al, 1990;Bergstrom et al, 1991;Donaldson, 1992;Lopes & Machado, 1998;Azuma et al, 1999;Jurgens et al, 2000;Frame, 2003;Seymour & Matthews, 2006). Becently, the traditional notion of pollination syndromes, e.g., beetle-pollinated flowers (cantharophily), small fly-pollinated flowers (myiophily), and bee-pollinated flowers (melittophily), has been shown to be inconsistent with the realized spectrum of visiting animals.…”