2016
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical antipredator defence is linked to higher extinction risk

Abstract: Many attributes of species may be linked to contemporary extinction risk, though some such traits remain untested despite suggestions that they may be important. Here, I test whether a trait associated with higher background extinction rates, chemical antipredator defence, is also associated with current extinction risk, using amphibians as a model system—a group facing global population declines. I find that chemically defended species are approximately 60% more likely to be threatened than species without ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the course of a comparative study on the conservation status of poisonous amphibians [73], a relationship was found in which chemically-defended amphibians are more likely to be threatened than others. Since it is difficult to identify the direction of this relationship from the GLM-style analyses (see Section 2) which support the link, a one pathway model was created in which a non-poisonous and non-threatened amphibian lineage could evolve to be a chemically defended and threatened one by changing either trait first, and another model that constrained chemical defence to evolve first (so defence changes before threat status does).…”
Section: How Did It Get To What We See Today? Evolutionary Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the course of a comparative study on the conservation status of poisonous amphibians [73], a relationship was found in which chemically-defended amphibians are more likely to be threatened than others. Since it is difficult to identify the direction of this relationship from the GLM-style analyses (see Section 2) which support the link, a one pathway model was created in which a non-poisonous and non-threatened amphibian lineage could evolve to be a chemically defended and threatened one by changing either trait first, and another model that constrained chemical defence to evolve first (so defence changes before threat status does).…”
Section: How Did It Get To What We See Today? Evolutionary Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, poisonous amphibians had lower diversification rates as a result of higher extinction rates than non-chemically-defended species [85]. The reasons for the increased extinction rate of poisonous amphibians over evolutionary time is still unknown, but persists into the present day as increased probability of having a threatened conservation status [73]. These results open up a new avenue for research to understand not just why poisonous amphibians suffer higher extinction risk, but why this differs from other toxic tetrapod groups.…”
Section: How Does It Relate To Evolution Of Lineages? Diversificatmentioning
confidence: 99%