2018
DOI: 10.17660/th2018/73.1.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical and sensory analysis of native genotypes and experimental lines of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional descriptive analyses such as QDA (quantitative descriptive analysis) were not chosen for this project as they do not reflect consumers' acceptability of the samples, and require longer time investment and commitment of trained panelists, which can also increase costs (Carneiro et al, 2020). The faster check-all-that-apply (CATA) descriptive method, which has already been used with affective tests to support breeding programs around the world (Lado et al, 2010;Vela-Hinojosa et al, 2018), was chosen to help explain our acceptability data. Sweetness has been reported as one of the most important sensory attributes to differentiate edamame genotypes (Wszelaki et al, 2005;Flores et al, 2019); in this study sweetness intensity also was included to estimate how consumers in the U.S. may perceive the sweetness of our edamame breeding lines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditional descriptive analyses such as QDA (quantitative descriptive analysis) were not chosen for this project as they do not reflect consumers' acceptability of the samples, and require longer time investment and commitment of trained panelists, which can also increase costs (Carneiro et al, 2020). The faster check-all-that-apply (CATA) descriptive method, which has already been used with affective tests to support breeding programs around the world (Lado et al, 2010;Vela-Hinojosa et al, 2018), was chosen to help explain our acceptability data. Sweetness has been reported as one of the most important sensory attributes to differentiate edamame genotypes (Wszelaki et al, 2005;Flores et al, 2019); in this study sweetness intensity also was included to estimate how consumers in the U.S. may perceive the sweetness of our edamame breeding lines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The descriptors "green/grassy, " "raw bean, " "starchy, " "metallic, " "astringent, " "sulfury/rotten egg, " "sour, " and "bitter, " once more, were associated with lower acceptability scores and were confirmed as undesired edamame sensory attributes for consumers in the U.S. According to Vara-Ubol et al (2004), some sensory attributes like "brown" "green/pea pod, " "musty/dusty, " "musty/earthy, " "nutty, " and "starchy" flavors, sour aromatics, and a powdery feel (texture) can be associated with the undesired "beany" characteristic, frequently associated with soybean products.…”
Section: Edamame Acceptancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CATA typically does not measure intensity of attributes, but can show differences in sensory profile (Alexi et al, 2018). It has been combined with traditional hedonic preference tests to support the development of food products such as strawberries in Uruguay (Lado et al, 2010), Amaranthus in South Africa (Hiscock et al, 2018), and tomatoes in Mexico (Vela-Hinojosa et al, 2018). Those researchers suggested CATA as a simple and less time-consuming method to evaluate differences among new genotypes and support the breeding selection.…”
Section: Sensory Evaluation and Consumer Studies In Plant Breeding: Imentioning
confidence: 99%