2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01512.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical and physical plant defence across multiple ontogenetic stages in a tropical rain forest understorey tree

Abstract: Summary 1.Variation over plant ontogeny can play an important role in shaping trade-offs between investing resources in growth, reproduction and defence. Most previous ontogenetic studies on plant defence have compared two life stages, making it impossible to follow complete ontogenetic trajectories for plant defence traits. 2. We used the highly defended rain forest understorey tree Ryparosa kurrangii to examine chemical (cyanogen concentrations; CN M ) and physical (leaf mass per area; LMA) ontogenetic defen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, as other researchers have pointed out (Goodger et al 2006;Ochoa-Lo´pez et al 2015), defensive strategies can vary in different growth stages depending on the pressures that operate in each case. The greater resource limitations for defensive mechanisms in seedlings with respect to mature trees would explain that at intraspecific level we do observe a compromise between chemical and physical defences, which has also been found by other authors (Eck et al 2001;Cornelissen et al 2009;Webber and Woodrow 2009). Since investment in anti-herbivore defences is assumed to reduce the resources available for growth (Koricheva 2002;Strauss et al 2002), one could expect that resource constraints on seedlings would not allow several defensive mechanisms to simultaneously occur.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, as other researchers have pointed out (Goodger et al 2006;Ochoa-Lo´pez et al 2015), defensive strategies can vary in different growth stages depending on the pressures that operate in each case. The greater resource limitations for defensive mechanisms in seedlings with respect to mature trees would explain that at intraspecific level we do observe a compromise between chemical and physical defences, which has also been found by other authors (Eck et al 2001;Cornelissen et al 2009;Webber and Woodrow 2009). Since investment in anti-herbivore defences is assumed to reduce the resources available for growth (Koricheva 2002;Strauss et al 2002), one could expect that resource constraints on seedlings would not allow several defensive mechanisms to simultaneously occur.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For example, during plant maturation, the amounts of chemical defences in leaves have been found to decrease in some studies (Donaldson et al 2006;Ochoa-Lo´pez et al 2015) and to increase in others (Herms and Mattson 1992;Boege and Marquis 2005). Similarly, both decreases (Gowda and Palo 2003;Boege 2005) and increases in physical defences (Webber and Woodrow 2009;Barton and Koricheva 2010) have been reported along ontogeny. In some cases, plant age had no significant effect on the physical (Wang et al 2016) or chemical (Loney et al 2006) defensive traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…; Loney et al. ; Webber and Woodrow ; Koricheva and Barton ). However, a meta‐analysis (Koricheva and Barton ) found that some chemical classes show no change (cyanogenic glycosides and condensed tannins) or were higher in mature than in young leaves (sesquiterpenes).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such changes in defenses could be related to the fact that expanding leaves are highly vulnerable to herbivores (Coley and Barone 1996). Other studies on woody plants also generally support higher concentrations of secondary metabolites for young leaves (Coley 1983;Mihaliak and Lincoln 1989;Gleadow and Woodrow 2000;Brenes-Arguedas et al 2006;Loney et al 2006;Webber and Woodrow 2008;Koricheva and Barton 2012). However, a meta-analysis (Koricheva and Barton 2012) found that some chemical classes show no change (cyanogenic glycosides and condensed tannins) or were higher in mature than in young leaves (sesquiterpenes).…”
Section: Investment In Secondary Metabolites Is Exceedingly High and mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The link with Induction of Chemical Defenses suggests a role for an ontogenetic control of the level of chemical defenses in trees (e.g. Boege & Marquis 2005;Webber & Woodrow 2009). The relationship between age and Initiation of Reproductive Structures suggests the existence of agerelated patterns in gibberellins, which have been shown to be involved in regulating the transition of meristematic buds from the vegetative to the reproductive state in several conifers (Haffner et al 1991;Vald es et al 2002;Vald es, Fern andez & Centeno 2003.…”
Section: P I G M E N T / H O R M O N a L C O N C E N T R A T I O N S mentioning
confidence: 99%