Chemical and physical influences on invertebrate drift in subarctic Alaskan streams

LaPerriere, Jacqueline D.

doi:10.31274/rtd-180813-1784

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 33 publications

(43 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We will assume that the stream is isothermal and the only difference between the pools is that drift density increases with the progression upstream, from one pool to the next, as reported by LaPerriere (1981LaPerriere ( , 1983). We will assume that the stream is isothermal and the only difference between the pools is that drift density increases with the progression upstream, from one pool to the next, as reported by LaPerriere (1981LaPerriere ( , 1983).…”

Section: Distribution Along Short Streamsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Model of Habitat Selection by Drift-Feeding Stream Salmonids at Different Scales

Hughes¹

1998

Ecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Ecological Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ecology.Abstract. Whole-stream size gradients of drift-feeding stream salmonids have received practically no attention, perhaps because the smaller-fish-upstream pattern that is thought to prevail is consistent with knowledge of habitat selection by other stream fish at the local scale. However, a rather counterintuitive larger-fish-upstream pattern has recently been documented for Arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in Alaska and brown trout (Salmo trutta) in New Zealand, and habitat selection theory cannot explain these observations. My goal in this paper is to improve this situation by developing a model that predicts the distribution of a population of fish both within single pools and over the length of the entire river, as well as the behavioral mechanism responsible. The model uses information on invertebrate drift density and water temperature to predict the growth rate of different sizes of fish at the positions available in the stream. Fish then distribute themselves so that each individual occupies the most profitable position it can defend, with the largest fish winning any disputes. The model suggests that streams can be classified into categories based on the way temperature and drift density vary with the passage downstream. Each of these categories favors a different combination of size gradient and behavioral mechanism. A larger-fish-upstream pattern due to size-dependent habitat preference is predicted for streams with cool temperatures and low drift densities, conditions found in Arctic grayling streams. A larger-fish-upstream pattern due to competition between fish of different size is predicted in warm streams, irrespective of drift density, conditions found in many New Zealand trout streams. A smaller-fish-upstream pattern due to competition between fish of different size is expected in cool streams with high drift abundance; currently no data are available to test this prediction.

show abstract

Section: Distribution Along Short Streamsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Model of Habitat Selection by Drift-Feeding Stream Salmonids at Different Scales

Hughes¹

1998

Ecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Chemical and physical influences on invertebrate drift in subarctic Alaskan streams

Cited by 1 publication

References 33 publications

A Model of Habitat Selection by Drift-Feeding Stream Salmonids at Different Scales

A Model of Habitat Selection by Drift-Feeding Stream Salmonids at Different Scales

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About