1987
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0728(87)85033-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical and mechanical properties of redox polymer-modified electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this observation, the predicted difference in formal potentials of 59 mV (eq 7) between the 0.01 and 0.1 M solutions is somewhat higher than the observed values. Our results show a smaller deviation from Nernstian behavior for PVF than reported previously. , We believe this is caused by differences in film history and experimental conditions.
5
6
…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite this observation, the predicted difference in formal potentials of 59 mV (eq 7) between the 0.01 and 0.1 M solutions is somewhat higher than the observed values. Our results show a smaller deviation from Nernstian behavior for PVF than reported previously. , We believe this is caused by differences in film history and experimental conditions.
5
6
…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Our results show a smaller deviation from Nernstian behavior for PVF than reported previously. 6,7 We believe this is caused by differences in film history and experimental conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar nonideal behavior has been described for other redox molecules that are specifically adsorbed to electrode surfaces, contained in self-assembled monolayer structures, or incorporated into polymeric redox films. The nonidealities associated with these fixed-site redox reactions have been attributed to a variety of factors and include concentration-dependent surface activity coefficients, inhomogeneity or a distribution of redox sites, excess chemical potentials, molecular dipole effects, Donnan equilibria, mechanical stress, and surface electrostatic effects . With the exception of inhomogeneity effects, most of these factors are thought to be relatively unimportant in the experiments described here and would not appreciably contribute to the observed non-Nernstian behavior.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[17][18][19][20][21] One of the most important conclusions of the work of Mauk and Moore 17 is that ''the possibility of redox state-dependent conformational changes should be considered''. Precisely, the idea of a redox potential being dependent on the state of tension (electron transfer/ deformation coupling) was introduced by Evans et al, [22][23][24] to explain the redox potential distribution of poly(vinylferrocene). The coupling of electron transfer, deformation, binding and electrostatic screening effects, was introduced to explain the redox potential distribution during the redox switching of arylamine substituted polymers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%