Abstract:Methanogenic sludge granules grown on waste water from a sugar refinery consisted of several bacterial morphotypes embedded in a matrix of extracellular material. Comparison of critical point drying and freeze-drying methods for preparing samples for scanning electron microscopy to determine the presence of extracellular material indicated that the former method permitted observations of extracellular material and intact cells. The effects of different extraction methods used for isolation of these extracellul… Show more
“…Table 7 shows the results of several tests designed to determine the number of specific bacterial groups in granules [31,33].…”
Section: Granule Microbiology and Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has been used to qualitatively determine the types of bacteria present (rods, cocci, etc.). The bacteria observed with the SEM could then be compared to the morphologies of known methanogens and other anaerobes, and a qualitative analysis could be made with the identification of some of the species present within the granule [10,31,37,64,80,89,102,119]. More recently, immunological probes and fluorescence techniques have become popular methods of identifying specific species of bacteria, especially methanogenic species [34,76,88, 101,118,158].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, immunological probes and fluorescence techniques have become popular methods of identifying specific species of bacteria, especially methanogenic species [34,76,88, 101,118,158]. The immunological probes utilize polyclonal antibodies specific for a given bacterial species to determine the presence of that Methanothrix has especially been singled out as a common bacterium in most granular sludges [31,37,64,102]. It has been postulated that in anaerobic systems with low acetate concentrations, Methanothrix will out-compete Methanosarcina due to the former's lower Kn, value (higher affinity) for acetate, although the two species are almost always present within the same granule in varying degrees.…”
This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI fihns the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be fi-om any type of computer printer.The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book.Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Table 2. Proton-reducing reactions by the acetogenic bacteria [14,27,143,168]. 23 Table 3. The methanogenic bacteria [12], 26 Table 4. Methanogenic substrates [12]. 27 Table 5. Important reactions by the methanogens [12,168]. 27 Table 6. Effects of alkali and alkaline-earth metals on anaerobic digestion [95]. 52 Table 7. Bacterial counts in granules from UASB reactors [31,33]. 91 Table 8. General composition of granules [31]. 96 Table 9. Granule chemical composition [32,33], 96 Table 10. Specific methanogenic activity of various biomass [32,87]. 99 Table 11. Substrates suitable for granule formation. 105 Table 12. Solubility products of metal salts [98]. 111 Table 13. Sucrose feed mixture. 126 Table 14. Beef extract and glucose feed mixture. 127 Table 15. Composition of the beef extract soup base. 128 Table 16. Nutrient (NPK) solution. 128 Table 17. Trace metal solution. 129 Table 18. Ames municipal water analysis. 131 Table 19. ASBR cycle time for 48 and 24-hr HRTs. 133 viii Table 20. Attachment matrices utilized for granulation enhancement. 138 Table 21. Polymer characteristics. 139 Table 22. Coagulants utilized for granulation enhancement. 139 Table 23. Operational parameters routinely tested. 141 Table 24. Reagents used in the COD test. 144 Table 25. Gas chromatography analysis setup. 158 Table 26. Elemental analysis of granules. 165 Table 27. Start-up and granulation summary. 232 Table 28. Summary of specific methanogenic activity experiments. 238 Table 29. Chemical composition of granular and initial seed biomass. 255 Table 30. COD data for the sucrose control test. 286 Table 31. Biogas data for the sucrose control test. 287 Table 32. Volatile acids data for the sucrose control test. 291 Ta...
“…Table 7 shows the results of several tests designed to determine the number of specific bacterial groups in granules [31,33].…”
Section: Granule Microbiology and Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has been used to qualitatively determine the types of bacteria present (rods, cocci, etc.). The bacteria observed with the SEM could then be compared to the morphologies of known methanogens and other anaerobes, and a qualitative analysis could be made with the identification of some of the species present within the granule [10,31,37,64,80,89,102,119]. More recently, immunological probes and fluorescence techniques have become popular methods of identifying specific species of bacteria, especially methanogenic species [34,76,88, 101,118,158].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, immunological probes and fluorescence techniques have become popular methods of identifying specific species of bacteria, especially methanogenic species [34,76,88, 101,118,158]. The immunological probes utilize polyclonal antibodies specific for a given bacterial species to determine the presence of that Methanothrix has especially been singled out as a common bacterium in most granular sludges [31,37,64,102]. It has been postulated that in anaerobic systems with low acetate concentrations, Methanothrix will out-compete Methanosarcina due to the former's lower Kn, value (higher affinity) for acetate, although the two species are almost always present within the same granule in varying degrees.…”
This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI fihns the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be fi-om any type of computer printer.The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book.Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Table 2. Proton-reducing reactions by the acetogenic bacteria [14,27,143,168]. 23 Table 3. The methanogenic bacteria [12], 26 Table 4. Methanogenic substrates [12]. 27 Table 5. Important reactions by the methanogens [12,168]. 27 Table 6. Effects of alkali and alkaline-earth metals on anaerobic digestion [95]. 52 Table 7. Bacterial counts in granules from UASB reactors [31,33]. 91 Table 8. General composition of granules [31]. 96 Table 9. Granule chemical composition [32,33], 96 Table 10. Specific methanogenic activity of various biomass [32,87]. 99 Table 11. Substrates suitable for granule formation. 105 Table 12. Solubility products of metal salts [98]. 111 Table 13. Sucrose feed mixture. 126 Table 14. Beef extract and glucose feed mixture. 127 Table 15. Composition of the beef extract soup base. 128 Table 16. Nutrient (NPK) solution. 128 Table 17. Trace metal solution. 129 Table 18. Ames municipal water analysis. 131 Table 19. ASBR cycle time for 48 and 24-hr HRTs. 133 viii Table 20. Attachment matrices utilized for granulation enhancement. 138 Table 21. Polymer characteristics. 139 Table 22. Coagulants utilized for granulation enhancement. 139 Table 23. Operational parameters routinely tested. 141 Table 24. Reagents used in the COD test. 144 Table 25. Gas chromatography analysis setup. 158 Table 26. Elemental analysis of granules. 165 Table 27. Start-up and granulation summary. 232 Table 28. Summary of specific methanogenic activity experiments. 238 Table 29. Chemical composition of granular and initial seed biomass. 255 Table 30. COD data for the sucrose control test. 286 Table 31. Biogas data for the sucrose control test. 287 Table 32. Volatile acids data for the sucrose control test. 291 Ta...
“…El piruvato, lactato y etanol son compuestos que pueden ser fácilmente fermentables por varias BSR (Dolfing, 1987;Widdel et al, 1988). Una característica importante de las BSR es su habilidad para llevar a cabo la oxidación acetogénica junto con las arqueobacterias metanogénicas hidrogenotróficas (AMH), como se describe para los co-cultivos de AMH con Desulfovibrio sp.…”
“…Many factors contribute, in one form or another, to the granulation process [6,7]. Granulation may be initiated by bacterial adsorption and adhesion to inert matters, to inorganic precipitates [2,8], and/or to each other through physico-chemical interactions and syntrophic associations [9]. These substances serve as initial precursors (carriers or nuclei) for further bacterial growth.…”
The effect of ferrous ion addition on the settling properties of the granules in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor was investigated. A UASB reactor (35ºC; pH=7) was operated for 3 months at a 20-h hydraulic retention time (
d-1 . After steady state conditions were achieved, the settling properties of granular sludge from the anaerobic sludge bed reactor were determined by using a novel upflow velocity test. From the results, it was concluded that iron promoted granulation. The U10% (10% of sludge washed out by applying upflow velocity U10%) was increased from 0,23 m.h -1 to 13,21 m.h -1 , while U30% from 0,87 m.h -1 to 29,11 m.h -1 and U60% from 6,63 m.h -1 to 49,82 m.h -1 .
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.