1988
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1097(88)90110-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical analysis of the surface of microorganisms by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Incidentally, it is noted that more extensive physico‐chemical analyses of non‐medically important yeast cell surfaces has been carried out using brewing yeasts [88, 89]. Hydrophobicity of the yeast cell surface, determined by hydrophobic interaction chromatography was caused by the presence of nitrogen‐rich proteinaceous groups, while furthermore hydrophobic brewing yeast strains also had higher isoelectric points than hydrophilic ones, similar to the physico‐chemical relationships revealed for bacterial strains.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Microbial Adhesive Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Incidentally, it is noted that more extensive physico‐chemical analyses of non‐medically important yeast cell surfaces has been carried out using brewing yeasts [88, 89]. Hydrophobicity of the yeast cell surface, determined by hydrophobic interaction chromatography was caused by the presence of nitrogen‐rich proteinaceous groups, while furthermore hydrophobic brewing yeast strains also had higher isoelectric points than hydrophilic ones, similar to the physico‐chemical relationships revealed for bacterial strains.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Microbial Adhesive Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The electric potential at microbial cell surfaces is generated by ionized basic and acidic groups. Amory et al (1988) and van Haecht et al (1982) concluded from X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy data, that the negative charge of microorganisms is mainly due to deprotonated phosphate groups that are partly neutralized by protonated amino groups.…”
Section: Microbial Surface Chargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1988;van Haecht et al 1982), zeta potential and electrophoretic mobility at p H 4.0 (Amory et al 1988) or at a more physiological p H (Biichs et al 1988, Abbott et al 1983, van Loosdrecht et al 1987b, Champluvier et al 1988. The corresponding parameters of the bacteria investigated were determined from the p H zeta-potential curves.…”
Section: Microbial Surface Chargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incidentally, it is noted that more extensive physico-chemical analyses of non-medically important yeast cell surfaces has been carried out using brewing yeasts [88,89]. Hydrophobicity of the yeast cell surface, determined by hydrophobic interaction chromatography was caused by the presence of nitrogen-rich proteinaceous groups, while furthermore hydrophobic brewing yeast strains also had higher isoelectric points than hydrophilic ones, similar to the physico-chemical relationships revealed for bacterial strains.…”
Section: Physico-chemical Features Of Adhesive Interactions Between Ymentioning
confidence: 83%