2016
DOI: 10.1002/asna.201612398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical abundance gradients from open clusters in the Milky Way disk: Results from the APOGEE survey

Abstract: Metallicity gradients provide strong constraints for understanding the chemical evolution of the Galaxy. We report on radial abundance gradients of

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the OC works of Friel et al (2002); Chen et al (2003); Magrini et al (2009), and also the later studies of Frinchaboy et al (2013) and Cunha et al (2016), using APOGEE data, all reach the same conclusions: that the radial metallicity gradient has been steeper in the past. However, this paradigm has been challenged by Salaris et al (2004) who, using the old OC sample of Friel (1995), reach the opposite conclusion, namely that the radial [Fe/H] gradient of the old OC population is shallower than the gradient of the young population.…”
Section: A Comparison With the Literaturesupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the OC works of Friel et al (2002); Chen et al (2003); Magrini et al (2009), and also the later studies of Frinchaboy et al (2013) and Cunha et al (2016), using APOGEE data, all reach the same conclusions: that the radial metallicity gradient has been steeper in the past. However, this paradigm has been challenged by Salaris et al (2004) who, using the old OC sample of Friel (1995), reach the opposite conclusion, namely that the radial [Fe/H] gradient of the old OC population is shallower than the gradient of the young population.…”
Section: A Comparison With the Literaturesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…To date, the only results that claim to trace the evolution of abundance gradients are based on planetary nebulae (PNe; e.g., Maciel & Chiappini 1994;Maciel & Quireza 1999;Stanghellini et al 2006;Maciel & Costa 2009;Stanghellini & Haywood 2010) and star clusters (e.g., Janes 1979; Twarog et al 1997;Carraro et al 1998;Friel et al 2002;Chen et al 2003;Magrini et al 2009;Yong et al 2012;Frinchaboy et al 2013;Cunha et al 2016), but the former are based on uncertain age and distance estimates and remain inconclusive 1 , while the latter allow essentially only for two wide age bins, and are affected by low-number statistics and non-trivial biases due to the rapid disruption of disc clusters. In addition to the value of the abundance gradient itself, the scatter of the R Gal −[Fe/H] relation can in principle be used to quantify the strength of radial heating and migration over cosmic time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a 7.0-11.5 in MaNGA-led fields. Cunha et al (2016), and APOGEE-2S is extending this large, homogeneous sample with 100 clusters in the rich star formation regions of the southern Galactic disk.…”
Section: Open and Globular Clustersmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Since open clusters can range in age from a few Myr to more than 6 Gyr, they also provide a unique opportunity to study the evolution of Galactic abundance gradient s. A number of authors have measured metallicity gradients for open clusters in various age bins (e.g., Carraro * Hubble Fellow Carnegie-Princeton Fellow † NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Fellow et al 1998;Friel et al 2002;Jacobson et al 2011;Carrera & Pancino 2011;Cunha et al 2016), and while all studies agree that the gradient is shallower for younger clusters, further comparison is difficult due to a somewhat heterogeneous choice of age bins; there does not seem to be a consensus as to the measured gradient for clusters of any given age range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%