2010
DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2010.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chelation for Heavy Metals (Arsenic, Lead, and Mercury): Protective or Perilous?

Abstract: Despite clinical experience that spans more than half a century, chelation for toxic heavy metals represents one of the most controversial and misapplied interventions in clinical toxicology. The prompt use of chelating agents to treat acute, life-threatening intoxication is an indication that is largely supported by experimental animal data and limited clinical research. Although chelating agents administered for chronic intoxication may accelerate the excretion of heavy metals, their therapeutic efficacy in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Beginning from the premise that the most important consideration in initiating a course of therapy (in this instance, chelation) is having the correct diagnosis, we should strive to ensure that these diagnoses are not based on false interpretation or manipulation of laboratory data. Furthermore, we should emphasize the importance of removal of a harmful substance (decorporation) as opposed to redistribution with the potential for harm associated with that action [24]. Efficacy of chelation treatment should be determined by the combination of demonstrated removal and improvement of causally related symptoms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beginning from the premise that the most important consideration in initiating a course of therapy (in this instance, chelation) is having the correct diagnosis, we should strive to ensure that these diagnoses are not based on false interpretation or manipulation of laboratory data. Furthermore, we should emphasize the importance of removal of a harmful substance (decorporation) as opposed to redistribution with the potential for harm associated with that action [24]. Efficacy of chelation treatment should be determined by the combination of demonstrated removal and improvement of causally related symptoms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When administered inappropriately, chelation therapy also increases the risks of cancer development and neurodevelopmental disorders, even death [4,5]. Chelating therapy should therefore never be considered unless the blood lead level reaches above 45 ug/dl [3]. For the less severe in toxications, some other safe interventions are very much needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important to note that proper chelating therapy will lead to serious adverse effects, which include dehydration, anemia, low blood calcium, damages to the kidneys and liver, allergic reactions, and nutritional defects [3]. When administered inappropriately, chelation therapy also increases the risks of cancer development and neurodevelopmental disorders, even death [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other uses include treating damaged arteries (atherosclerosis) by removing calcium from arterial plaques, curing or improving symptoms of autism, preventing or curing neurodegenerative conditions such as alzheimer's disease, kidney dysfunction, eye disorder, thyroid, arthritis and etc. [1]. Carnosine, β-alanyl-L-histidine, is a naturally occurring dipeptide that in humans is preferentially localized in skeletal muscles and brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%