1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(99)00010-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chelant extraction of heavy metals from contaminated soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
293
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 514 publications
(301 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
293
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also other problems associated with the use of EDTA in remediation. For example, EDTA is recalcitrant in the environment and buildup of EDTA can lead to potential toxicity issues (Anupa et al, 2008;Peters, 1999). EDTA is biodegraded in soil under aerobic conditions at an estimated half-life of 120-300 days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also other problems associated with the use of EDTA in remediation. For example, EDTA is recalcitrant in the environment and buildup of EDTA can lead to potential toxicity issues (Anupa et al, 2008;Peters, 1999). EDTA is biodegraded in soil under aerobic conditions at an estimated half-life of 120-300 days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High organic-matter content in the soil affects the washing processes because the high molecular weight humus organic substances have a high affinity for metals and form water-insoluble metal complexes (Peters, 1999). Influence of organic matter on the removal of heavy metals by soil washing techniques employing sodium metabisulfite and EDTA solutions is reported (Abumaizar and Khan, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the release of metals from the contaminated soil depends not only on the solid phase incorporation of the metals, but also on the extraction conditions, e.g. concentration of the extractants, pH conditions, co-existing competing ion concentrations and comparative selectivity of the chelants towards the metal ions (Peters, 1999;Barona et al, 2001;Tandy et al, 2004).The comparative SSE results showed that a significant reduction in the metal contents of fraction 1 (in the range of 50-100%) was occurred after the treatment with the chelants except that for Cu with EDDS and IDSA (efficiency of reduction was 11% and 32%, respectively). The Pb content became zero except for the system with EDDS (efficiency of reduction: 80%), which may be due to its low content (7.9 mg kg -1 ) in the corresponding soil fraction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…propensity of indium in the reaction system, re-sorption of the ML complexes in the active surface sites of the solid matrix, etc. [30,31]. Furthermore, the kinetic hindrance occurred at varying extent during the coordination interactions between the metal ion and the multidentate chelants [25] may precede the usual extraction preferences.…”
Section: Effect Of Chelant Type and Corresponding Metal-chelant Stabimentioning
confidence: 99%