1990
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(90)78841-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cheddar and Cheshire Cheese Rheology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At a given strain % in the linear viscoelastic region the value of G 0 was significantly greater than G 00 , indicating a dominant elastic character of the cheeses. Tunick et al (1990) reported similar results for Cheddar and Cheshire cheeses. G 00 , as in the case of G 0 , showed downward inflections at strains above the linear viscoelastic region.…”
Section: Rheological Propertiessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At a given strain % in the linear viscoelastic region the value of G 0 was significantly greater than G 00 , indicating a dominant elastic character of the cheeses. Tunick et al (1990) reported similar results for Cheddar and Cheshire cheeses. G 00 , as in the case of G 0 , showed downward inflections at strains above the linear viscoelastic region.…”
Section: Rheological Propertiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…All of the cheeses showed similar profiles characterized by a linear region exhibiting a constant value of G 0 at low strain %, followed by a sharp downward inflection in G 0 at larger strains. Tunick et al (1990) reported that the inflection suggests cheese body breakdown and that the amount of stress that the cheese can withstand before breakdown is evidenced by the shift of the inflection point. Furthermore, when strains exceed those of the linear viscoelastic region, bonds break-down and reform at different rates depending on structure network within cheeses, so that they exhibit different G 0 values.…”
Section: Rheological Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The Ea values were obtained from the data in Table 4 and using equation 6 (45 ± 11, 61 ± 5 and 59 ± 7 kJ/mol for batches A, B and C respectively). The higher E a values for the B and C batches indicate that their micellar networks break down less easily than in A batch (Tunick, Nolan, Shieh, Basch, & Thompson, 1990). This is consistent with the higher values of parameters D f and Q, since their casein networks possess a large number of attractive interactions, and hence higher reticular extent and elastic character (Figures 2 and 3).…”
Section: Fractal Dimensionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The disc-shaped cheese samples were then transferred to plastic bags to prevent dehydration and stored at $5-6 1C for at least 2 h before testing. The cheese samples were glued to the bottom plate of the rheometer with cyanoacrylate to prevent slippage (Nolan, Holsinger, & Shieh, 1989;Tunick et al, 1990). To help prevent slippage from the top plate during testing, a serrated plate measuring system (MP31, 50 mm diameter) was used in the test (Rosenberg, Wang, Chuang, & Shoemaker, 1995).…”
Section: Rheological Properties Of Cheeses Made From Milks Standardizmentioning
confidence: 99%