2011
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2011.451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Checkpoint control and cancer

Abstract: DNA-damaging therapies represent the most frequently used non-surgical anticancer strategies in the treatment of human tumors. These therapies can kill tumor cells, but at the same time they can be particularly damaging and mutagenic to healthy tissues. The efficacy of DNAdamaging treatments can be improved if tumor cell death is selectively enhanced, and the recent application of poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in BRCA1/2-deficient tumors is a successful example of this. DNA damage is known to trigger… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
154
0
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
3
154
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The cell cycle with its various check point proteins sees to it that the abnormal cells do not divide in the body. The cell cycle is either arrested to correct the DNA repairs in the abnormal cells or the cells are forced to undergo apoptosis (Medema & Macurek, 2011). The cell cycle check points are lost in cancer and hence the cells proliferate at a very high rate (Hartwell and Kastan, 1994).…”
Section: Mif and Cell Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cell cycle with its various check point proteins sees to it that the abnormal cells do not divide in the body. The cell cycle is either arrested to correct the DNA repairs in the abnormal cells or the cells are forced to undergo apoptosis (Medema & Macurek, 2011). The cell cycle check points are lost in cancer and hence the cells proliferate at a very high rate (Hartwell and Kastan, 1994).…”
Section: Mif and Cell Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3F and G). DNA damage can trigger a p53-dependent or independent cell cycle arrest (42). In MCF7, ARIH1 knockdown did not alter basal cell cycle distribution or CP-induced increase in S/G 2 ( Fig.…”
Section: A Ubiquitination Rnai Screen Identifies Cp Response Modulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other microRNAs were also related to regulatory mechanism DNA damage repair or radiosensitivity. MicroRNA-101 was associated with DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) and ATM to sensitize neoplasms to radioation; 59,60 microRNA-210 and miR-373 are overexpressed in hypoxic cells and regulate the expression of various aspects in DNA damage repair pathways; 61,62 microRNA-125b, microRNA-504, and microRNA-33 were correlated to p53 (one major factor in DNA-damage checkpoint activation); 63,64 microRNA-421 downregulation of ATM leading to clinical manifest tumor radiosensitivity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; 65 microRNA-7 increases radiosensitivity of human tumor cells with activated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) associated signaling; 66 microRNA-221 and microRNA-222 control radiation sensitivity by controlling the PTEN/Akt pathway; 67 microRNAs (-155, -20a, -25, and -15a) are involved in the regulation of IR-induced premature senescence; 68 lin28-let7 modulates radiosensitivity of human cancer cells with activation of K-Ras. 69 In conclusion, it is not very clear if the global mechanism of microRNA disturbs sensitivity to radiation, but it is evidence that cellular radiosensitivity could indeed be influenced by microRNAs.…”
Section: Microrna Changes After Irmentioning
confidence: 99%