Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae

Broad, Gavin R.

doi:10.3897/bdj.4.e9042

Cited by 20 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 84 publications

(95 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Cladograms showing optimization of individual characters were produced using MacClade 4.03 (Maddison and Maddison 2001) and Mesquite 2.75 (Maddison and Maddison 2011). Nodal support on parsimony cladograms is shown by optimization of morphological characters using ACCTRAN which favours reversals over parallelisms as well as by decay index values (Bremer 1994) calculated using TNT (shown as a boxed number under each node or taxon) (see Fig. 117).…”

Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Phylogeny of the subfamilies of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera)

Bennett¹,

Cardinal²,

Gauld³

et al. 2019

JHR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A combined morphological and molecular phylogenetic analysis was performed to evaluate the subfamily relationships of the parasitoid wasp family Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera). Data were obtained by coding 135 morphological and 6 biological characters for 131 exemplar species of ichneumonids and 3 species of Braconidae (the latter as outgroups). The species of ichneumonids represent all of the 42 currently recognized subfamilies. In addition, molecular sequence data (cytochrome oxidase I “DNA barcoding” region, the D2 region of 28S rDNA and part of the F2 copy of elongation factor 1-alpha) were obtained from specimens of the same species that were coded for morphology (1309 base pairs total). The data were analyzed using parsimony and Bayesian analyses. The parsimony analysis using all data recovered previously recognized informal subfamily groupings (Pimpliformes, Ophioniformes, Ichneumoniformes), although the relationships of these three groups to each other differed from previous studies and some of the subfamily relationships within these groupings had not previously been suggested. Specifically, Ophioniformes was the sister group to (Ichneumoniformes + Pimplformes), and Labeninae was placed near Ichneumoniformes, not as sister group to all Ichneumonidae except Xoridinae. The parsimony analysis using only morphological characters was poorly resolved and did not recover any of the three informal subfamily groupings and very few of the relationships were similar to the total-evidence parsimony analysis. The molecular-only parsimony analysis and both Bayesian analyses (total-evidence and molecular-only) recovered Pimpliformes, a restricted Ichneumoniformes grouping and many of the subfamily groupings recovered in the total-evidence parsimony analysis. A comparison and discussion of the results obtained by each phylogenetic method and different data sets is provided. It is concluded that the molecular characters produced results that were relatively consistent with traditional, non-phylogenetic concepts of relationships between the ichneumonid subfamilies, whereas the morphological characters did not (at least not by themselves). The inclusion of both molecular and morphological characters using parsimony produced a topology that was the closest to the traditional subfamily relationships. The method of analysis did not greatly affect the overall topology for the molecular-only analyses, but there were differences between Bayesian and parsimony results for the total-evidence analyses (especially near the root of the tree). The Bayesian results did not seem to be altered very much by the inclusion of morphological characters, unlike in the parsimony analysis. In summary, the following groups were supported in multiple analyses regardless of the characters used or method of tree-building: Pimpliformes, higher Ophioniformes, higher Pimpliformes, (Claseinae + Pedunculinae), (Banchinae + Stilbopinae), Campopleginae, Cremastinae, Diplazontinae, Ichneumoninae (including Alomya), Labeninae, Ophioninae, Poemeniinae, Rhyssinae, and Tersilochinae sensu stricto. Conversely, Ctenopelmatinae and Tryphoninae were never recovered without inclusion of other taxa. Based on the hypothesis of relationships obtained by the total-evidence parsimony analysis, the following formal taxonomic changes are proposed: Alomyinae Förster (= Alomya Panzer and Megalomya Uchida) is once again synonymized with Ichneumoninae and is now considered a tribe (Alomyinirev. stat.); and Notostilbops Townes is transferred from Stilbopinae to Banchinae, tribe Atrophini.

show abstract

Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Phylogeny of the subfamilies of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera)

Bennett¹,

Cardinal²,

Gauld³

et al. 2019

JHR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…near Shore Wood (NS427878). This species was new to the Scottish checklist of Ichneumonidae (Broad, 2016) (which included searches of the Natural History Museum collection), absent from SIRI, and confirmed as absent from the original invertebrate collections held by National Museums Scotland and World Museum Liverpool. There is a pre-existing record of I. stramentor on iRecord (https://www.brc.ac.uk/irecord/) from Handa Island, Sutherland, on 20th July 2013, but no photographs were provided and the recorder was not known to Gavin Broad, making the record unverifiable (Gavin Broad, pers.…”

mentioning

confidence: 77%

Blepharidopterus diaphanus (Kirschbaum, 1856) (Heteroptera: Miridae) and Ichneumon stramentor (Rasnitsyn, 1981) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) new to Scotland, amongst other notable invertebrates discovered at RSPB Scotland Loch Lomond during summer 2019

Buckton¹

2020

The Glasgow Naturalist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…However, we collected only two parasitoid species, T. circumflexum and Ophioninae sp., which have very little parasitism. Broad (2016) reported that T. circumflexum parasitizes various larvae of Noctuidae. Based on the literature, there have been no reports of direct parasitism in H. armigera by T. circumflexum.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Monitoring of four major lepidopteran pests in Korean cornfields and management of Helicoverpa armigera

Kim

Kwon²,

Park³

et al. 2018

Entomological Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lepidopterans such as Helicoverpa armigera are emerging pests of corn in Korea, causing huge yield losses and deteriorating the quality of the corn crop. We monitored four major lepidopteran pests in major corn growing areas of Korea by employing sex pheromone traps from 2012 to 2015 to understand population dynamics. H. armigera, Ostrinia furnacalis, Spodoptera litura, Spodoptera exigua and Mythimna separata were collected from April to October. Among these species, H. armigera was found to be the main pest based on crop damage intensity (80–90% of the total damage). H. armigera was generally observed during the earing stage of corn and would migrate to other fields during September to October for overwintering. We also tested select insecticides against larvae of H. armigera in the laboratory. The most effective insecticide was indoxacarb, which was applied at specific times to manage H. armigera in cornfields. Optimal timing of spraying was estimated at about 70 days after planting (earing season) to control for H. armigera. Additionally, two species of parasitoid (Therion circumflexum and Ophioninae sp.) were identified from H. armigera. However, more extensive surveys are needed to organize a control program based on natural enemies.

show abstract

Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae

Cited by 20 publications

References 84 publications

Phylogeny of the subfamilies of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera)

Phylogeny of the subfamilies of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera)

Blepharidopterus diaphanus (Kirschbaum, 1856) (Heteroptera: Miridae) and Ichneumon stramentor (Rasnitsyn, 1981) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) new to Scotland, amongst other notable invertebrates discovered at RSPB Scotland Loch Lomond during summer 2019

Monitoring of four major lepidopteran pests in Korean cornfields and management of Helicoverpa armigera

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About