2007
DOI: 10.1049/iet-syb:20060076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Checking the reliability of a linear-programming based approach towards detecting community structures in networks

Abstract: Abstract. We investigate the reliability of a recent approach to use parameterized linear programming for detecting community structures in networks. Using a one-parameter family of objective functions, a number of "perturbation experiments" document that our approach works rather well. We also analyze a real-life network and a family of benchmark networks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…also [79]), eco-efficiency in logistics networks [74], the understanding of community structures [19], aspects of lifestyle and awareness, the sustainable development of our societies [36], and educational measurements as well. Socio-econo-environment networks can become an expression of such an extension, which might be called "soft" today but can be in the range and service of applied mathematics tomorrow.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…also [79]), eco-efficiency in logistics networks [74], the understanding of community structures [19], aspects of lifestyle and awareness, the sustainable development of our societies [36], and educational measurements as well. Socio-econo-environment networks can become an expression of such an extension, which might be called "soft" today but can be in the range and service of applied mathematics tomorrow.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our algorithm reveals their relationships quite well, but we skip the results here (to be published -together with results obtained for simulated data -elsewhere [12] and available upon request) and, instead, shortly discuss the time complexity of our approach:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if we put N := 3 (as the latter two methods really suggest that there should be three communities), the METIS-algorithms produce, not unexpectedly, more mistakes. Measuring the number of mistakes using the "single-element transfer distance" introduced by Charon et al [11] (also discussed in [12]), for kmetis the distance is 12, and for pmetis the distance is 9.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers from various disciplines analyze community structure using eigenvectors and sparse matrix formulations [23], algebraic connectivity [24], partitioning techniques [25], small-world effect [12], parameterized linear programming [26], and many other methods. These approaches provide better results, but are computationally expensive as they require global information of the network.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%