2008
DOI: 10.1017/s1471068408003451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Checking the quality of clinical guidelines using automated reasoning tools

Abstract: Requirements about the quality of clinical guidelines can be represented by schemata borrowed from the theory of abductive diagnosis, using temporal logic to model the timeoriented aspects expressed in a guideline. Previously, we have shown that these requirements can be verified using interactive theorem proving techniques. In this paper, we investigate how this approach can be mapped to the facilities of a resolution-based theorem prover, otter, and a complementary program that searches for finite models of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of such issues is the verification of properties of clinical guidelines, i.e., in order to improve quality of guidelines, proving that some properties, expressed in a temporal logic, hold for all executions of a guideline, whose model is expressed in a formal language. Theorem proving techniques have been adopted for verification in the Protocure and Protocure II projects [22], [25], while model checking techniques have been explored in Protocure II and GLARE [23], [24].…”
Section: Conclusion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of such issues is the verification of properties of clinical guidelines, i.e., in order to improve quality of guidelines, proving that some properties, expressed in a temporal logic, hold for all executions of a guideline, whose model is expressed in a formal language. Theorem proving techniques have been adopted for verification in the Protocure and Protocure II projects [22], [25], while model checking techniques have been explored in Protocure II and GLARE [23], [24].…”
Section: Conclusion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the growing need to offer user support in decisionmaking processes some studies have been presented [71,72], related to the qualitative models and qualitative reasoning in Database Theory and in AI research. With respect to the problem of knowledge representation and reasoning mechanisms in LP, a measure of the quality-of-information (QoI) of such programs has been object of some work with promising results [73][74][75]. The QoI [17] with respect to the extension of a predicate i will be given by a truth-value in the interval [0,1], i.e., if the information is known (positive) or false (negative) the QoI for the extension of predicate i is 1.…”
Section: Quality-of-informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With all this complexity, a large number of errors can occur (Byleveld et al 2008). A failure can be defined as failure of a planned action and use of an incorrect plan, and these can be in connection with products, processes, and systems (Hommerson et al 2008). The best way to prevent similar errors from happening again is to report them, i.e., create experiential learning systems to identify their causes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%