1997
DOI: 10.1109/91.618276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Checking the coherence and redundancy of fuzzy knowledge bases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
82
0
8

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
82
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This inference mechanism gives an interpretation and semantics, which differ from mechanisms using implication. In particular, it assures the consistency of the rule base [18]. If no information is processed that is the input space is not covered by rule set; the output gives an "unknown defect".The chosen classifier is based on Ishibuchi's algorithm which provides an automatic rule generation step [19].…”
Section: Fuzzy Rule Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This inference mechanism gives an interpretation and semantics, which differ from mechanisms using implication. In particular, it assures the consistency of the rule base [18]. If no information is processed that is the input space is not covered by rule set; the output gives an "unknown defect".The chosen classifier is based on Ishibuchi's algorithm which provides an automatic rule generation step [19].…”
Section: Fuzzy Rule Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iterative version of the method [21] is used here because it supports the rule of having the maximum response. The expert must prepare defective sample sets to generate the fuzzy rules via an automatic rule generation algorithm [18].…”
Section: Fuzzy Rule Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only exception in favor of the implicative approach represented byR is an existence of a sort of "built-in" consistency checking mechanism [10], which uses the definition of the notion of coherence [11]. This only underlines the fact that implicative rules are not only more appropriate semantical model with respect to the syntactical form of the IF-THEN rules (1), but at least equally or even more practical than the Mamdani-Assilian rules that are used significantly more often [12].…”
Section: Fuzzy Rules and Inference Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let A i , i ∈ N n , be one of the antecedent fuzzy sets of LD. Then we will denote by C i the result of r P bLD (11) for A 0 = A i . Sketch of the proof: According to (10),…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , n} denotes a set of n fuzzy rules (where U and V are the domains of the variables X and Y respectively), the degree of coherence ‡ of S is defined as 24 :…”
Section: Coherence Of a Collection Of Fuzzy Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%