2016
DOI: 10.1680/jgeen.15.00132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CHD pile performance: part II – numerical modelling

Abstract: A set of simple finite-element modelling procedures that can be used to estimate the load–settlement behaviour of continuous helical displacement (CHD) piles in sand is presented. The approach makes use of a stress- and strain-dependent non-linear soil model that can be parameterised using basic soil data that can be determined through routine site investigation. The procedures are validated against a database of physical model tests (reported in a companion paper), where they are shown to be suitable for esti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, due to the variable tip geometry, the decision was made to investigate the presence of base separation on loading results using FEM of a CHD pile installed in medium dense sand (D r = 59%) with no effect being noted. This is reported in the companion paper (Knappett et al, 2016).…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, due to the variable tip geometry, the decision was made to investigate the presence of base separation on loading results using FEM of a CHD pile installed in medium dense sand (D r = 59%) with no effect being noted. This is reported in the companion paper (Knappett et al, 2016).…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…This paper focuses on the 1g laboratory physical modelling and proposes refinements to current (capacity-based) analytical design techniques. The companion paper (Knappett et al, 2016) describes the non-linear FEM, which was developed as a simple tool for predicting load-settlement behaviour (at the serviceability limit state) and which, like the analytical approaches, only requires routinely available site investigation data and access to commercially available FEM software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model vertical boundaries were set to 60 times the pile shaft diameter (D p ) in each direction from the pile centreline in order to be compatible with minimal lateral separation specified in other similar studies (i.e. Bolton et al, 1999;Phillips and Valsangkar, 1987), whereas the base of the model was extended to eight times the screw pile helical plate diameter (D h ) below the pile tip for all the models, as verified by Knappett et al (2016) (Figure 2). The top boundary was free to move in all directions whereas the bottom boundary was fully fixed and the vertical side boundaries were allowed only vertical deformation.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model has been used in several previous studies where FEA was validated against 1g and centrifuge physical model testing (e.g. Al-Baghdadi et al, 2016;Aldaikh et al, 2014;Al-Defae et al, 2013;Knappett et al, 2014Knappett et al, , 2015Knappett et al, , 2016.…”
Section: 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation