Abstract:IntroductionOpen‐source generative artificial intelligence (AI) applications are fast‐transforming access to information and allow students to prepare assignments and offer quite accurate responses to a wide range of exam questions which are routinely used in assessments of students across the board including undergraduate dental students. This study aims to evaluate the performance of Chat Generative Pre‐trained Transformer (ChatGPT), a generative AI‐based application, on a wide range of assessments used in c… Show more
“…The current investigation utilized a multiple-choice examination format. ChatGPT demonstrated the capability to furnish rapid responses within seconds, as well as to provide answers and information during the interaction, consistent with prior research by Ahn (2023) [9] and Ali et al (2023) [18]. The findings unveiled that ChatGPT possessed a rudimentary grasp of nursing knowledge, resulting in a success rate exceeding 54.05%.…”
Section: The Performance Of Chatgpt On Rnlesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…ChatGPT's medical knowledge and interpretative capabilities within the field of medicine remained insufficient and unreliable. Ahn (2023) [10] highlighted ChatGPT's tendency to retrieve erroneous information and skills through web searches, potentially stemming from inaccurate data sources. According to the findings of this study, ChatGPT exhibited the potential to generate misleading or incorrect explanations, even though it adeptly rephrased unclear or incomprehensible questions [2].…”
Section: To Evaluate the Advantages And Disadvantages Of Using Chatgptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utility of ChatGPT encompasses its role as an interactive tool for medical education to facilitate the learning process [1,3]. Moreover, it has the potential to revolutionize the virtual learning of students [10]. However, the application of ChatGPT has its constraints, which encompass the possibility of generating biased output, concerns regarding information Healthcare 2023, 11, 2855 2 of 12 accuracy, and its potential influence on students' critical thinking and communication skills, among other factors [7,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these opinions show that we need to apply evidence-based research to understand the potential shortcomings of implementing ChatGPT in healthcare education [12]. AI chatbots still lack the ability to present statistical analyses, and although they can simulate text for various scenarios, they are unable to generate visual animations [2,10,24].…”
(1) Background: AI (artificial intelligence) chatbots have been widely applied. ChatGPT could enhance individual learning capabilities and clinical reasoning skills and facilitate students’ understanding of complex concepts in healthcare education. There is currently less emphasis on its application in nursing education. The application of ChatGPT in nursing education needs to be verified. (2) Methods: A descriptive study was used to analyze the scores of ChatGPT on the registered nurse license exam (RNLE) in 2022~2023, and to explore the response and explanations of ChatGPT. The process of data measurement encompassed input sourcing, encoding methods, and statistical analysis. (3) Results: ChatGPT promptly responded within seconds. The average score of four exams was around 51.6 to 63.75 by ChatGPT, and it passed the RNLE in 2022 1st and 2023 2nd. However, ChatGPT may generate misleading or inaccurate explanations, or it could lead to hallucination; confusion or misunderstanding about complicated scenarios; and languages bias. (4) Conclusions: ChatGPT may have the potential to assist with nursing education because of its advantages. It is recommended to integrate ChatGPT into different nursing courses, to assess its limitations and effectiveness through a variety of tools and methods.
“…The current investigation utilized a multiple-choice examination format. ChatGPT demonstrated the capability to furnish rapid responses within seconds, as well as to provide answers and information during the interaction, consistent with prior research by Ahn (2023) [9] and Ali et al (2023) [18]. The findings unveiled that ChatGPT possessed a rudimentary grasp of nursing knowledge, resulting in a success rate exceeding 54.05%.…”
Section: The Performance Of Chatgpt On Rnlesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…ChatGPT's medical knowledge and interpretative capabilities within the field of medicine remained insufficient and unreliable. Ahn (2023) [10] highlighted ChatGPT's tendency to retrieve erroneous information and skills through web searches, potentially stemming from inaccurate data sources. According to the findings of this study, ChatGPT exhibited the potential to generate misleading or incorrect explanations, even though it adeptly rephrased unclear or incomprehensible questions [2].…”
Section: To Evaluate the Advantages And Disadvantages Of Using Chatgptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utility of ChatGPT encompasses its role as an interactive tool for medical education to facilitate the learning process [1,3]. Moreover, it has the potential to revolutionize the virtual learning of students [10]. However, the application of ChatGPT has its constraints, which encompass the possibility of generating biased output, concerns regarding information Healthcare 2023, 11, 2855 2 of 12 accuracy, and its potential influence on students' critical thinking and communication skills, among other factors [7,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these opinions show that we need to apply evidence-based research to understand the potential shortcomings of implementing ChatGPT in healthcare education [12]. AI chatbots still lack the ability to present statistical analyses, and although they can simulate text for various scenarios, they are unable to generate visual animations [2,10,24].…”
(1) Background: AI (artificial intelligence) chatbots have been widely applied. ChatGPT could enhance individual learning capabilities and clinical reasoning skills and facilitate students’ understanding of complex concepts in healthcare education. There is currently less emphasis on its application in nursing education. The application of ChatGPT in nursing education needs to be verified. (2) Methods: A descriptive study was used to analyze the scores of ChatGPT on the registered nurse license exam (RNLE) in 2022~2023, and to explore the response and explanations of ChatGPT. The process of data measurement encompassed input sourcing, encoding methods, and statistical analysis. (3) Results: ChatGPT promptly responded within seconds. The average score of four exams was around 51.6 to 63.75 by ChatGPT, and it passed the RNLE in 2022 1st and 2023 2nd. However, ChatGPT may generate misleading or inaccurate explanations, or it could lead to hallucination; confusion or misunderstanding about complicated scenarios; and languages bias. (4) Conclusions: ChatGPT may have the potential to assist with nursing education because of its advantages. It is recommended to integrate ChatGPT into different nursing courses, to assess its limitations and effectiveness through a variety of tools and methods.
“…To fully realize the potential bene ts of LLMs for dental education, the limitations and accuracy of LLMs needs to be assessed, so that effective quality control can be designed and implemented to safeguard against inaccurate and biased responses to dental-related queries [10]. Despite many analyses conducted to assess LLMs' responses [11][12][13], the research in this area is still in its infancy, and the implications of LLMs for dental education remain insu ciently understood. In this paper, we explore the utility and effectiveness of LLMs to enhance dental students' learning experiences, with a focus on the use of ChatGPT [1], one of the leading LLMs.…”
The recent rise of powerful large language model (LLM)-based AI tools, exemplified by ChatGPT and Bard, poses a great challenge to contemporary dental education while simultaneously offering a unique resource and approach that potentially complements today’s teaching and learning, where existing widely available learning resources have often fallen short. Although both the clinical and educational aspects of dentistry will be shaped profoundly by the LLM tools, the didactic curricula, which primarily rely on lecture-based courses where instructors impart knowledge through presentations and discussions, need to be upgraded urgently. In this paper, we used dental course materials, syllabi, and textbooks adopted currently in the School of Dentistry (SOD) at Meharry Medical College to assess the potential utility and effectiveness of ChatGPT in dental education. We collected the responses of the chatbot to questions as well as students' interactions with it for assessment. Our results showed that ChatGPT can assist in dental essay writing and generate relevant content for dental students, in addition to other benefits. The limitations of ChatGPT were also discussed in the paper.
BackgroundChat Generative Pre‐trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is a freely available online artificial intelligence (AI) program capable of understanding and generating human‐like language. This study assessed veterinary students’ perceptions about ChatGPT in education and practice. It compared perceptions about ChatGPT between students who had completed a critical analysis task and those who had not.MethodsThis cross‐sectional study surveyed 498 Doctor of Veterinary Medicine (DVM) students at The University of Sydney, Australia. Second‐year DVM students researched a veterinary pathogen and then completed a critical analysis of ChatGPT (version 3.5) output for the same pathogen. A survey based on the Technology Acceptance Model was then delivered to all DVM students from all years of the programme, collecting data using Likert‐style, categorical and free‐text items.ResultsOver 75% of the 100 respondents reported having used ChatGPT. The students found ChatGPT's output relevant and practical for their use but perceived it as inaccurate. They perceived ChatGPT output to be more useful for veterinary students than for pet owners or veterinarians. Those who had completed the critical analysis assignment had a more positive view of ChatGPT's practicality for veterinary students but noted its authoritative tone even when delivering inaccurate information. Over 50% of the students agreed that information about tools such as ChatGPT should be included in the veterinary curriculum. Students agreed that veterinarians should embrace AI but disagreed that AI would eventually replace the need for veterinarians.ConclusionsA critical appraisal of outputs from AI tools such as ChatGPT may help prepare future veterinarians for the effective use of these tools.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.