2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1905.11968
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chasing Convex Bodies Optimally

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 4), thus showing a reduction from dynamic regret to convex body chasing, under only the Lipschitzness assumption on f t . Furthermore, recent work of (Sellke, 2019) shows that for any norm • * , there exists an algorithm with competitive ratio ω = d. This immediately implies the following new dynamic regret result.…”
Section: Further Reduction To Convex Body Chasingmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…( 4), thus showing a reduction from dynamic regret to convex body chasing, under only the Lipschitzness assumption on f t . Furthermore, recent work of (Sellke, 2019) shows that for any norm • * , there exists an algorithm with competitive ratio ω = d. This immediately implies the following new dynamic regret result.…”
Section: Further Reduction To Convex Body Chasingmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…4. According to (Sellke, 2019), when B * is the 2-norm ball, the dependence on d can be improved to √ d ln T .…”
Section: Corollary 6 Algorithm 3 With Option III Ensuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore it is interesting to explore nonconvex and nonconcave nonstationary saddle point optimization problems in the online and bandit settings, by extending appropriately, the definitions of regret proposed in [RBGM19] for the argmin-type online nonconvex problems recently. Furthermore, recently the problem of convex body chasing, considered in [FL93] initially, has regained significant attention; see for example [BLLS19,Sel19,AGGT19]. It is intriguing to precisely formulate saddle-point versions of convex bodies chasing problem and explore algorithms for it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%