2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charting a future for epidemiologic training

Abstract: Purpose To identify macro level trends that are changing the needs of epidemiologic research and practice and to develop and disseminate a set of competencies and recommendations for epidemiologic training that will be responsive to these changing needs. Methods There were three stages to the project: 1) assembly of a working group of senior epidemiologists from multiple sectors, 2) Identifying relevant literature, and 3) conducting key informant interviews with 15 experienced epidemiologists. Results Twel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also point to what the foundational knowledge and activities in epidemiology might look like down the road. Some of these topics are consistent with a recent report on future training provided by a group of senior epidemiologists [4]. This is reassuring that there is some convergence between student views and that of leaders in the field.…”
Section: What's Next?supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also point to what the foundational knowledge and activities in epidemiology might look like down the road. Some of these topics are consistent with a recent report on future training provided by a group of senior epidemiologists [4]. This is reassuring that there is some convergence between student views and that of leaders in the field.…”
Section: What's Next?supporting
confidence: 85%
“…These discussions continue to play out at national meetings and in print and represent a healthy and expected debate in any discipline, especially one with both core principles and a history of integrating methods and approaches from other disciplines. Intertwined with these discussions has been consideration of the future of epidemiology and how student training should be crafted [4-5]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…63 The required new skill sets and the impending big data changes suggest that training programs for the cardiovascular epidemiology work force for this millennium will need to be redesigned dramatically emphasizing skill sets that are multidimensional and iteratively acquired over the course of one’s career (Table). 46, 62, 64–66 …”
Section: The Multidisciplinary Workforce In Cardiovascular Epidemiolomentioning
confidence: 99%
“… a The first two columns are adapted from Brownson et al (12) b Sources : CDC/CSTE Competencies for Applied Epidemiologists in Governmental Public Health Agencies (CDC/CSTE) (13); Doctor of Public Health Core Competency Model (DrPH) (14); Council on Linkages between Academia and Public Health Practice, Core Competencies for Public Health Professionals (CL) (15); American College of Epidemiology, Workshop on Doctoral Education in Epidemiology (ACE) (16); Core Competencies for Public Health Professionals (MPH) (17); …”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macro trends reach nationally and globally, involving changing demographics, economic factors, technology changes, and legal, political, or social conditions. In work sponsored by the American College of Epidemiology, a team of senior epidemiologists recently identified the following 12 macro trends that are affecting the practice of epidemiology (12): 1) greater focus on upstream causes of disease; 2) shifting demographics; 3) the Affordable Care Act or health care system reform; 4) globalization; 5) changing health communication environment; 6) growing centrality of team and transdisciplinary science; 7) emergence of translational sciences; 8) greater focus on accountability; 9) big data or informatics; 10) emerging high-throughput technologies (“omics”); 11) privacy changes; and 12) evolving funding environment (Table 1) (13–17). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%