2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-020-04478-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charrs of the genus Salvelinus (Salmonidae): hybridization, phylogeny and evolution

Abstract: Evolutionary history, systematics and taxonomy of charrs of the genus Salvelinus and especially of the representatives of the S. alpinus -S. malma species complex remain confused that is connected with a substantial ecological and morphological flexibility of this group and with supposed ancient hybridization between some taxa. For the analysis of phylogenetic relationships and introgressive hybridization between the species of the genus Salvelinus including three endemic species from Lake El'gygytgyn and all … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(120 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in spite of nearly similar FA composition and contents of diets, farmed S. alpinus and S. fontinalis had significantly different levels of 18:1n-9, ∑20:1, and 20:5n-3. These differences might be determined genetically, because S. fontinalis is known as the most diverged species of genus Salvelinus [ 59 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in spite of nearly similar FA composition and contents of diets, farmed S. alpinus and S. fontinalis had significantly different levels of 18:1n-9, ∑20:1, and 20:5n-3. These differences might be determined genetically, because S. fontinalis is known as the most diverged species of genus Salvelinus [ 59 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of selection often contributes to the expansion of a subset of phenotypic traits and the formation of evolutionary innovations (Hunt et al 2011;Lahti et al 2009;Snell-Rood et al 2010). This type of shaping is shown in various teleost species such as barbs (de Graaf et al 2010;Levin et al 2020), Sevan trout (Levin et al 2018), Arctic char (Alekseyev et al 2002;Osinov et al 2021), and cichlids (Barluenga et al 2006;Kautt et al 2020). At the same time we suggest that the geographic separation and glaciation during Pleistocene does not explain our findings, since the lake forms are genetically close to each other, but geographically distant.…”
Section: Genetic Diversity Of the Lake Form Of Pacific Herringmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…This type of selection often contributes to the expansion of a subset of phenotypic traits and the formation of evolutionary innovations ( Hunt et al, 2011 ; Lahti et al, 2009 ; Snell-Rood et al, 2010 ). This type of shaping is shown in various teleost species such as barbs ( De Graaf et al, 2010 ; Levin et al, 2020 ), Sevan trout ( Levin et al, 2018 ), Arctic char ( Alekseyev et al, 2002 ; Osinov, Volkov & Mugue, 2021 ), and cichlids ( Barluenga et al, 2006 ; Kautt et al, 2020 ). At the same time we suggest that the geographic separation and glaciation during Pleistocene does not explain our findings, since the lake forms are genetically close to each other, but geographically distant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%