2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CharmeRT: Boosting Peptide Identifications by Chimeric Spectra Identification and Retention Time Prediction

Abstract: Coeluting peptides are still a major challenge for the identification and validation of MS/MS spectra, but carry great potential. To tackle these problems, we have developed the here presented CharmeRT workflow, combining a chimeric spectra identification strategy implemented as part of the MS Amanda algorithm with the validation system Elutator, which incorporates a highly accurate retention time prediction algorithm. For high-resolution data sets this workflow identifies 38–64% chimeric spectra, which result… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
91
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(72 reference statements)
3
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DART-ID aims to use all MS2 spectra, including those of very low confidence PSMs, and combines them with accurate RT estimates to update peptide-spectrum-match (PSM) confidence within a principled Bayesian framework. Unlike previous MS2-based methods which incorporate RT estimates into features for FDR recalculation [12], discriminants [13], filters [14][15][16], or scores [17,18], we update the ID confidence directly with a Bayesian model [19,20] Crucial to this method is the accuracy of the alignment method; the higher the accuracy of RT estimates, the more informative they are for identifying the peptide sequence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…DART-ID aims to use all MS2 spectra, including those of very low confidence PSMs, and combines them with accurate RT estimates to update peptide-spectrum-match (PSM) confidence within a principled Bayesian framework. Unlike previous MS2-based methods which incorporate RT estimates into features for FDR recalculation [12], discriminants [13], filters [14][15][16], or scores [17,18], we update the ID confidence directly with a Bayesian model [19,20] Crucial to this method is the accuracy of the alignment method; the higher the accuracy of RT estimates, the more informative they are for identifying the peptide sequence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches either (i) predict RTs from peptide sequences or (ii) align empirically measured RTs. Estimated peptide RTs have a wide range of uses, such as scheduling targeted MS/MS experiments [21], building efficient inclusion and exclusion lists for LC-MS/MS [22,23], or augmenting MS2 mass spectra to increase identification rates [13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results of the MS/MS search engine were filtered to 1 % FDR on protein and peptide level using the Elutator algorithm [8], implemented as node to Proteome Discoverer 2.3. Identified peptide features were extracted from the raw-files and quantified, using the in-house-developed Proteome Discover-node apQuant [9].…”
Section: Technical Briefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these 200 feature groups, 58 were identified through closer inspection as, often modified, UPS peptides and often came from chimeric spectra. One helpful approach in identifying these chimeric spectra was by filtering out the fragment peaks of an already identified peptide species and applying another open modification search [8].…”
Section: Ups-yeast Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%