2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.116.212002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charm-Quark Production in Deep-Inelastic Neutrino Scattering at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order in QCD

Abstract: We present a fully differential next-to-next-to-leading order calculation of charm-quark production in charged-current deep-inelastic scattering, with full charm-quark mass dependence. The next-to-next-toleading order corrections in perturbative quantum chromodynamics are found to be comparable in size to the next-to-leading order corrections in certain kinematic regions. We compare our predictions with data on dimuon production in (anti)neutrino scattering from a heavy nucleus. Our results can be used to impr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next-to-leading order (NLO) is used only for inclusive jet data from the Tevatron and the LHC and for deepinelastic scattering (DIS) charged-current data from HERA and fixed-target experiments. The NNLO predictions for these processes [18][19][20] were not available or incomplete at the time of the CT14 study, and we have argued [1,21] that the effect of missing NNLO terms in jet production on the PDFs is small relatively to the experimental uncertainties in the CT14 data sets. Similarly, the NNLO contribution for charged-current DIS, including massive charm scattering contributions, is modest compared to the experimental uncertainties.…”
Section: Jhep02(2018)059mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next-to-leading order (NLO) is used only for inclusive jet data from the Tevatron and the LHC and for deepinelastic scattering (DIS) charged-current data from HERA and fixed-target experiments. The NNLO predictions for these processes [18][19][20] were not available or incomplete at the time of the CT14 study, and we have argued [1,21] that the effect of missing NNLO terms in jet production on the PDFs is small relatively to the experimental uncertainties in the CT14 data sets. Similarly, the NNLO contribution for charged-current DIS, including massive charm scattering contributions, is modest compared to the experimental uncertainties.…”
Section: Jhep02(2018)059mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Besides the LHC electroweak boson production cross sections, we examined the implications of the IC for associate production of Z boson and charm-jet at the LHC, and summarized our findings in table 2 and figures [16][17][18][19]. A fixed-order calculation for Z + c production, MCFM at NLO, was compared to a merged parton showering calculation in Sherpa, which also generates charm jets in the final state via gluon splittings.…”
Section: Jhep02(2018)059mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In a recent publication [40] the O(α 2 s ) corrections (NNLO) to charm production in CC DIS were presented. However, no analytical expression was provided.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar calculation was performed for charm quark production in neutrino deep inelastic scattering (DIS) in Ref. [36]. For the corrections to the light-quark line, we adopted the method of "projection-to-Born" in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%