2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.94.114037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charm quark and meson production in association with single-jet at the LHC

Abstract: We discuss charm quark/antiquark and charmed meson production in association with one extra jet (gluon, quark, antiquark) at the LHC. The calculations are performed both in collinear and k T -factorization approaches. Different unintegrated gluon distribution functions are used in the k T -factorization approach. Several predictions for the LHC are presented. We show distributions in rapidity and transverse momenta of c/c (or charmed mesons) and the associated jet as well as some two-dimensional observables. I… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed also in Ref. [20] the k T -factorization approach with the KMR UGDF gives results well consistent with collinear NLO approach. For the calculation of the KMR distribution we used here up-to-date collinear MMHT2014 gluon PDFs [26].…”
Section: A Parton-level Calculationssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As discussed also in Ref. [20] the k T -factorization approach with the KMR UGDF gives results well consistent with collinear NLO approach. For the calculation of the KMR distribution we used here up-to-date collinear MMHT2014 gluon PDFs [26].…”
Section: A Parton-level Calculationssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Very recently, this approach was also profitably applied e.g. for pp → cc + jet X [20], pp → cc + 2jets X [21] and pp → cccc X [22].…”
Section: A Parton-level Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed also in Ref. [18] the k Tfactorization approach with the KMR UGDF gives results consistent with collinear NLO approach. For the calculation of the KMR distribution we used here up-to-date collinear MMHT2014 gluon PDFs [26].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…As discussed also in Ref. [15] the k T -factorization approach with the KMR UGDF gives results well consistent with collinear NLO approach. For the calculation of the KMR distribution we used here up-to-date collinear MMHT2014 gluon PDFs [16].…”
Section: A Sketch Of the Theoretical Formalism 21 Parton-level Calcusupporting
confidence: 78%