2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charm and bottom photoproduction at HERA with MC@NLO

Abstract: We apply the MC@NLO formalism to the production of heavy-quark pairs in pointlike photon-hadron collisions. By combining this result with its analogue relevant to hadron-hadron collisions, we obtain NLO predictions matched to parton showers for the photoproduction of QQ^{-} pairs. We compare MC@NLO results to the measurements of c- and b-flavoured hadron observables performed by the H1 and ZEUS collaborations at HERA.Comment: 20 pages, 27 figure

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All these processes are implemented for hadron-hadron collisions. Heavy quark photoproduction has been considered in [18]. The aMC@NLO project, developing a fully automated NLO event generator based on the MC@NLO scheme, with loop corrections from MadLoop [19] using the OPP method [20,21], has provided results on a range of more complex processes of interest [22,23,24].…”
Section: Mc@nlomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these processes are implemented for hadron-hadron collisions. Heavy quark photoproduction has been considered in [18]. The aMC@NLO project, developing a fully automated NLO event generator based on the MC@NLO scheme, with loop corrections from MadLoop [19] using the OPP method [20,21], has provided results on a range of more complex processes of interest [22,23,24].…”
Section: Mc@nlomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data show a larger relative contribution from resolved photon processes in beauty compared to charm production. The data are reasonably well described by the MC models and the MC@NLO [8] calculation with the exception of HER-WIG [9] which is low in normalisation. For charm production the central prediction of MC@NLO fall also below the data.…”
Section: Charm and Beauty Photoproduction Using Semi-muonic Decays Inmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For this process, ggg, qqg collinear as well as interference terms need to be taken into account; these are given by Eqns. (58), (46), and (61) respectively. We have for the collinear subtraction terms…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More accurate predictions therefore call for the inclusion of these NLO calculations in Monte Carlo event generators, which provide predictions for fully differential corrections to the LO process. Many such generators exist at parton level [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], and in recent years a lot of progress has equally been made to automatize the matching of these processes with parton showers in the Powheg and (a)MC@NLO [22,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]] frameworks 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%