Charles Tilly, globalization, and labor’s citizen rights

Abstract

Since the 1990s, observers have seen globalization impairing labor’s rights. We take Charles Tilly as an exemplar of this view, subjecting his 1995 article to critical appreciation. We argue that Tilly, known for his work on the National Social Movement, overlooked the fact that some unions under pressure from global neo-liberalism can employ a protest repertoire employing their citizen rights, while others continue to use labor rights. We use port workers, who are directly exposed to globalization, to show how different political opportunity structures and different strategic choices influence these choices. In Sweden, our exemplar of a neo-corporatist system, we find that the employment of labor rights continues to be robust; in the USA, our exemplar of a fully-fledged neo-liberal system, we find much greater recourse to a repertoire calling on citizen rights. Finally, in Australia and Great Britain, countries undergoing a shift to neo-liberalism in the 1980s and 1990s, we show that strategic choice influences how effectively unions adapt to shifts towards neo-liberalism: Australian unions effectively used citizen rights while the British port unions failed to make this strategic shift.

EXPORTING LABOR RELATIONS ACROSS THE ATLANTIC? INSIGHTS ON LABOR RELATIONS POLICIES OF GERMAN CORPORATIONS IN THE U.S.1

“…As the recent attacks on labor in Wisconsin and other states has shown, unions are battling to defend not only labor rights but also “members' rights as citizens ” (italics in original; Gentile and Tarrow 2009). Whether unions can find more lasting ways to facilitate cooperation is an enormous challenge, as is the question as to whether there is any space for labor and capital to find common ground for the kind of social dialog, which was a key factor in Europe's recovery after World War II.…”

A New Era for Labor Activism? Strategic Mobilization of Human Rights Against Blacklisting

“…In recent years, similar trends have arisen around the world, as labor activists have used human rights frameworks to draw attention to precarious working conditions and restrictions on labor activism (Compa and Diamond 1996;Gross 2003;Gentile and Tarrow 2009;Savage 2009;Kang 2012). In Europe, this trend has been specifically marked by the judgments of the ECtHR in the past decade.…”

Placing Transport Workers on the Agenda: The Conflicting Logics of Governing Mobility on Bishkek's Marshrutkas

“…Transport workers' mobilisation and precarity has so far been most extensively studied by labour anthropologists (Bedi 2016;Ference 2016) and scholars of social movements (Gentile and Tarrow 2009) and development (Rizzo 2011). Discussion of labour struggles involving Uber and its cognates is only just starting in legal studies (Rogers 2017), technology studies (Wallsten 2015) and the computing sciences (Gl€ oss et al 2016).…”