2001
DOI: 10.1177/007327530103900202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charles Hartt, Louis Agassiz, and the Controversy over Pleistocene Glaciation in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, natural science was already working with the scientific method: inferring theories by observation, then refining theories by comparing them to the emerging evidence, without being hindered by what prominent scientists had claimed. For example, Charles Hartt, a geologist who worked extensively in Brazil and served for a time as the Commissioner of Geology of Brazil, eventually critiqued the pre-conceived creationist theories of Louis Agassiz, his famous Harvard mentor, about the role of the Ice Age in Amazonian geology, because of what he observed in the stratigraphy and sedimentology in his repeated visits there in the second half of the 19th century (BRICE and FIGUEIROA, 2001). Interestingly, for Agassiz the theory of worldwide glaciations was crucial for proving his racist notion of polygenesis: the separate and unequal divine creation of the human races that contradicted Darwin's ideas of evolution by natural selection on a sucession of related species.…”
Section: The Theory Of Environmental Limitation In Amazoniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, natural science was already working with the scientific method: inferring theories by observation, then refining theories by comparing them to the emerging evidence, without being hindered by what prominent scientists had claimed. For example, Charles Hartt, a geologist who worked extensively in Brazil and served for a time as the Commissioner of Geology of Brazil, eventually critiqued the pre-conceived creationist theories of Louis Agassiz, his famous Harvard mentor, about the role of the Ice Age in Amazonian geology, because of what he observed in the stratigraphy and sedimentology in his repeated visits there in the second half of the 19th century (BRICE and FIGUEIROA, 2001). Interestingly, for Agassiz the theory of worldwide glaciations was crucial for proving his racist notion of polygenesis: the separate and unequal divine creation of the human races that contradicted Darwin's ideas of evolution by natural selection on a sucession of related species.…”
Section: The Theory Of Environmental Limitation In Amazoniamentioning
confidence: 99%