2010
DOI: 10.1353/jhr.2010.0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charitable Giving by Married Couples Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
18
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Power in financial and time allocation decisions is based on the resources each partner brings to the household and the attractiveness of his or her non‐cooperative alternatives within (Lundberg & Pollak, ) or outside (McElroy & Horney, ) the partnership. The bargaining model predicts that the partner with more education and more earnings is more likely to influence decisions about the allocation of resources, including donated money and time (Andreoni, Brown, & Rischall, ; Bilodeau & Slivinski, ; Pollak, ; Yörük, ). The need to bargain with one's spouse would add a “transaction cost” to each charitable giving decision, making it less emotionally rewarding to give money to charity.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Power in financial and time allocation decisions is based on the resources each partner brings to the household and the attractiveness of his or her non‐cooperative alternatives within (Lundberg & Pollak, ) or outside (McElroy & Horney, ) the partnership. The bargaining model predicts that the partner with more education and more earnings is more likely to influence decisions about the allocation of resources, including donated money and time (Andreoni, Brown, & Rischall, ; Bilodeau & Slivinski, ; Pollak, ; Yörük, ). The need to bargain with one's spouse would add a “transaction cost” to each charitable giving decision, making it less emotionally rewarding to give money to charity.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need to bargain with one's spouse would add a “transaction cost” to each charitable giving decision, making it less emotionally rewarding to give money to charity. Andreoni and colleagues () used the theory of transaction costs to explain why joint‐deciding couples give less to charity than couples in whom only one person decides, but it should be noted that a later study (Yörük, ), which used PSID data, found that joint deciders actually gave more to charity.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations