Charismatic leadership in Sri Lankan business organizations

Abstract

Purpose -As the number of studies reported on the new leadership approach in the South Asian region and especially in Sri Lanka is very limited, the present study aims to explore to what extent the Conger and Kanungo (C-K) model can be employed to explain the leadership phenomenon in Sri Lanka. Design/methodology/approach -A survey was undertaken among 53 managers who are reading for MBA degrees using the questionnaire devised and validated by Conger and Kanungo, and the data were subjected to principle component factor (varimax rotation) analysis. Findings -The paper finds that the Sri Lankan version of charismatic leadership is found to be similar to the C-K model in terms of personal risk, sensitivity to member needs and sensitivity to the environment. However, it differs from the C-K model, as it does not contain unconventional behavior and articulation of vision, and contains a new dimension -creating excitement. The variation is attributed to some aspects of culture i.e. conservative, hierarchical, caring and less futuristic. Originality/value -There have not been very many attempts at replicating new leadership theories in the South Asian region that is in some ways, i.e. level of development, religion and cultural values, different from the rest of the world. The present study fills this empirical gap.

Examining store manager effects in consumer and staff satisfaction: Evidence from Thailand

“…Indeed, the widely adopted Western-derived frameworks usually lack even the mildest forms of cultural validation (Cheng, 1995;Swierczek, 1988). Endorsing this view, much cross-cultural research has also supported that leadership is a culture bound concept and culturally unique or at least that considerably distinctive leadership constructs certainly exist (Jayakody, 2008).…”

Characteristics of high performing managers in The Netherlands

“…In order to identify the characteristics of HPMs, the framework of Excellent Leadership by Selvarajah et al (1995) was chosen because this framework is based on a multicultural approach, and because it has both etic and emic traits (Jayakody, 2008). The etic approach argues that leadership theories are universal while the emic approach claims that these are culture – or context‐specific (Jayakody, 2008). Instead of the terms etic and emic, Morrison (2000) used the terms generalizable and idiosyncratic.…”

Are ethical theories relevant for ethical leadership?

“…Servant leaders rely on service, while transformational leaders rely on their charismatic abilities. Charismatic leadership : Politis (2002) said that charismatic leeaders provides the vision and energy for knowledge sharing within the organization. However, Jayakody (2008) mentioned that some conditions (such as a crisis) could cause charisma to emerge. However, Politis suggested that we should take the surrounding culture into account.…”