1996
DOI: 10.1007/s002880050280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charged particle multiplicities in deep inelastic scattering at HERA

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The success of the k = 1 special case of the HNBD (even with omitted systematic errors of P n ) suggests that the inelastic pp and deep-inelastic e + p multiplicity distributions are similarly shaped. This seems to be confirmed by the observation [15] that the H1 data and the best-fit NBD deviate from each other at small multiplicities. Due to the diffractive fraction of events, the same happens for inelastic pp data too.…”
Section: (3) One Obtainssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The success of the k = 1 special case of the HNBD (even with omitted systematic errors of P n ) suggests that the inelastic pp and deep-inelastic e + p multiplicity distributions are similarly shaped. This seems to be confirmed by the observation [15] that the H1 data and the best-fit NBD deviate from each other at small multiplicities. Due to the diffractive fraction of events, the same happens for inelastic pp data too.…”
Section: (3) One Obtainssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In ref. [8] the multiplicity distributions measured by the H1 Collaboration [15] were compared to the Weibull case of the HNBD neglecting systematic errors of P n . To avoid possible misunderstanding we repeated the analysis with the inclusion of both sources of experimental uncertainties.…”
Section: (3) One Obtainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). Furthermore, a name for the "instanton particle" is set by QIPARC (1) T Use weight due to instanton cross section QICONT(4) T Disregard instanton minimum mass requirement QICONT (5) T Generate Q ′2 before x ′ QICONT (6) T Enforce mass of current quark in kinematics QICONT (9) T Enforce maximum allowed number of gluons QICONT (11) T Check that energy suffices for gluon generation QICONT (13) T Kill events with mass too high QICONT (14) T Use z generation as dz/z QICONT (15) T Generate x ′ with efficiency parametrization QICONT (16) T Generate Q ′2 with efficiency parametrization QICONT (18) T Use HERWIG rather than JETSET hadronization QICONT (20) T Azimuthal angle of e ′ generated randomly QICONT (21) T Full hadronization on/off QIWARF(1) F Q ′2 upper generation limit reset QIWARF(2) F Q ′2 lower generation limit reset QIWARF(3) F x ′ upper generation limit reset QIWARF(4) F x ′ lower generation limit reset QIWARF (5) F Attempt to (re)set non-existent logical parameter (QISETF) QIWARF (6) F Attempt to read non-existent logical parameter (QIGETF) QIWARF (7) F Attempt to (re)set non-existent integer parameter (QISETI) QIWARF (8) F Attempt to read non-existent integer parameter (QIGETI) QIWARF(9) F Attempt to (re)set non-existent double precision parameter (QISETD) QIWARF(10) F Attempt to read non-existent double precision parameter (QIGETD) QIWARF (11) F Current quark mass requirement does not fit to the selected order of variable generation (c. f. QICONT(5)) QIWARF (12) F Negative k 2 T for current quark, reset to 0.0 QIWARF (14) F Too many iterations in QIGMUL QIRCAL T Check kinematical limits Table 5 Logical flags set in QIINIT (T = .TRUE., F = .FALSE. ).…”
Section: Procedurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier versions of QCDINS have been used already to establish first experimental bounds on the rate of instanton-induced events at HERA [11][12][13] and to develop instanton search strategies [7].…”
Section: Long Write-up 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%