2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2004.04.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge transfer states of C2 in Kr clusters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extracted energy difference from the experimental spectra is 0.63 eV, which is close to the theoretically predicted value of 0.59 eV. Furthermore, the observed band structure compares well with our previous theoretical predictions . On the basis of these arguments, we assign the 188−209 nm bands to Kr n + C 2 - ← Kr n C 2 CT absorptions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The extracted energy difference from the experimental spectra is 0.63 eV, which is close to the theoretically predicted value of 0.59 eV. Furthermore, the observed band structure compares well with our previous theoretical predictions . On the basis of these arguments, we assign the 188−209 nm bands to Kr n + C 2 - ← Kr n C 2 CT absorptions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The linear C 2 Xe values calculated in this study by BCCD(T)/avtz ( r e = 3.4 Å, Δ E = −47 meV) match well with the BCCD(T)/d-avqz calculations by Breidung and Thiel (3.3 Å, −52 meV) . These values are very different to those reported for the linear C 2 Ar (4 Å and −14 meV) and C 2 Kr (4 Å and −18 meV) complexes. , Indeed, we propose this difference is the reason for unusual spectroscopy of C 2 in solid Xe. If the trapping cavity size in Xe lattice is larger than the r e of C 2 Xe, the C 2 dopant would be expected to be asymmetrically centered within the cavity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations