1999
DOI: 10.1021/om9902075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge-Transfer Salts of Octamethylferrocenyl Thioethers with Organic Acceptors (TCNQ and TCNQF4) and Trihalides (Br3- and I3-). Synthesis, Structure, and Physical Properties

Abstract: Six charge-transfer (CT) complexes containing three different octamethylferrocene derivatives (Fe(η5-C5Me4SMe)2, 1; Fe(η5-C5Me4S t Bu)2, 2; Fe(η5-C5Me4S)2S, 3) and TCNQ or TCNQF4, respectively (4−9), have been prepared and fully characterized. X-ray crystal structural studies of 4, 5, 7, and 9 have been carried out. The CT complexes 4 and 5, containing TCNQ, display stacks of acceptor molecules with noncommon donor/acceptor stoichiometries of 3:7 for 4 and 1:3 for 5, whereas the charge-transfer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again the closest non-hydrogen contact between the ions is between one of the terminal iodine atoms and a carbon of one of the bipyridine ligands (3.711 Å). For other structural examples in which there is evidence for a I 3 - /cation charge-transfer interaction, the reported interaction distances are between 3.70 and 4.11 Å . The relative positioning and separation of the I 3 - and bpy ligand strongly suggest a solid-state charge-transfer interaction in [Cr(bpy) 2 (NCS) 2 ]I 3 similar to that for I - in [Cr(dmb) 2 (NCS) 2 ]I.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Again the closest non-hydrogen contact between the ions is between one of the terminal iodine atoms and a carbon of one of the bipyridine ligands (3.711 Å). For other structural examples in which there is evidence for a I 3 - /cation charge-transfer interaction, the reported interaction distances are between 3.70 and 4.11 Å . The relative positioning and separation of the I 3 - and bpy ligand strongly suggest a solid-state charge-transfer interaction in [Cr(bpy) 2 (NCS) 2 ]I 3 similar to that for I - in [Cr(dmb) 2 (NCS) 2 ]I.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For other structural examples in which there is evidence for a I 3 -/cation chargetransfer interaction, the reported interaction distances are between 3.70 and 4.11 Å. 15 The relative positioning and separation of the I 3and bpy ligand strongly suggest a solidstate charge-transfer interaction in [Cr(bpy) 2 (NCS) 2 ]I 3 similar to that for Iin [Cr(dmb) 2 (NCS) 2 ]I. Unfortunately, because of the interference from the strong, broad I 3spectral band we were not able to obtain the same sort of corroborating spectral data with I 3as was possible for I -.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The interplanar distance between two contiguous TCNQF 4 anions in one dimer is 3.10 A ˚, which is considerably shorter than what is expected for a van der Waals distance and also apparently shorter than what was observed in charge-transfer complexes with ferrocene (3.23 A ˚)17 and octamethylferrocenyl thioethers (3.16 A ˚). 18 The EDT-TTF units form dimeric structures in the column with an interplanar distance of 3.342( 12) A ˚. Two adjacent dimers in a column are linked by weak S … S interactions (S(6) … S(2 4c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19] Similar structural features are found in [Fe(C 5 H 5 )(C 5 H 4 CHϭCH-9-C 16 H 9 )][TCNQ] with pyrene acting as both a substituent on the cyclopentadienyl ring and overlapping with the TCNQ, which remains essentially neutral. [20] Of more interest, structurally, are compounds obtained with octamethylferrocenyl thioethers, [Fe(C 5 Me 4 SR) 2 ], R ϭ Me, tBu, and TCNQ or TCNQF 4 , [21] Our objective is to use these ferrocenes to build up a net of positive charges that will control the TCNQ stacking through electrostatic interactions. The size and orientation of the ferrocene cations can control the number of TCNQ units that will stack, thus inducing either the localization or the partial delocalization of electronic charges on the TCNQs.…”
Section: ][Tcne]mentioning
confidence: 99%