2001
DOI: 10.1029/2000ja000437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge transfer of keV O+ ions with atomic oxygen

Abstract: Abstract. We report absolute differential cross sections for charge transfer scattering of 0.5-5 keV O+(4S) ground state and O+(2D, 2p) metastable ions by atomic oxygen at angles between 0.04 ø and 3 ø in the laboratory frame. Absolute total charge transfer cross sections, derived from these measurements, are compared with previously published data. The measurements were made using a flowing gas target, which consisted of a mixture of atomic and molecular oxygen produced by passing 02 through a microwave disch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(21 reference statements)
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The agreement between these studies is perhaps not too unexpected since, in contrast with the case of O + ‐H collisions, symmetric resonant channels are available for all O + ‐O collisions and the cross sections for ground‐ and excited‐state ions would not be expected to differ markedly. This supposition has recently been confirmed by the state‐specific study of Lindsay et al [2001], who report that the O + ( 2 D , 2 P ) excited‐state cross section is only 30% smaller than that for ground‐state ions. Given the especial challenges posed by these O + ‐O measurements, it is encouraging to see that all of the studies are in reasonable agreement; the mixed‐state data of Stebbings et al [1964] and those of Rutherford and Vroom [1974] lie between the ground‐ and excited‐state cross sections of Lindsay et al [2001] and all three studies are therefore consistent.…”
Section: Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The agreement between these studies is perhaps not too unexpected since, in contrast with the case of O + ‐H collisions, symmetric resonant channels are available for all O + ‐O collisions and the cross sections for ground‐ and excited‐state ions would not be expected to differ markedly. This supposition has recently been confirmed by the state‐specific study of Lindsay et al [2001], who report that the O + ( 2 D , 2 P ) excited‐state cross section is only 30% smaller than that for ground‐state ions. Given the especial challenges posed by these O + ‐O measurements, it is encouraging to see that all of the studies are in reasonable agreement; the mixed‐state data of Stebbings et al [1964] and those of Rutherford and Vroom [1974] lie between the ground‐ and excited‐state cross sections of Lindsay et al [2001] and all three studies are therefore consistent.…”
Section: Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This supposition has recently been confirmed by the state‐specific study of Lindsay et al [2001], who report that the O + ( 2 D , 2 P ) excited‐state cross section is only 30% smaller than that for ground‐state ions. Given the especial challenges posed by these O + ‐O measurements, it is encouraging to see that all of the studies are in reasonable agreement; the mixed‐state data of Stebbings et al [1964] and those of Rutherford and Vroom [1974] lie between the ground‐ and excited‐state cross sections of Lindsay et al [2001] and all three studies are therefore consistent. The higher‐energy data of Lo et al [1971] are also consistent with the other measurements.…”
Section: Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this is not important as long as a significant scattering does not occur. Recently Lindsay et al [2001] published the differential cross sections for charge‐exchange scattering in the reaction O + + O for the energies 0.5–5 keV that is very close to the energy range 0.1–10 keV in question. As one can see in their Figure 2 the differential cross section's distributions over the entire range are highly peaked at 0°.…”
Section: Neutral Densities and Charge‐exchange Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These efforts have been reviewed by Salah (1993) up to 1993 and are still ongoing (e.g., see Buonsanto et al, 1997b;Omidvar et al, 1998;Lindsay, 2001).…”
Section: O + -O Collision Frequency: Burnside Factormentioning
confidence: 99%