2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/abba9a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge transfer in SnS2/Na0.9Mg0.45Ti3.55O8 heterojunction in photocatalytic process

Abstract: SnS2/Na0.9Mg0.45Ti3.55O8 (SNMTO) composite photocatalyst was synthesized by a hydrothermal method. The chemical combination in lattice scale between SnS2 and Na0.9Mg0.45Ti3.55O8 (NMTO) was observed by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, indicating that heterojunctions were obtained between SnS2 and NMTO. The photocatalytic activity of SNMTO heterojunctions was improved in comparison with that of pure NMTO and SnS2 for the photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue and Rhodamine B. Electrons wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) mounted on the scanning probe microscope (SPM, Dimension Icon, Bruker Nano Inc.) was employed to measure the surface potential in the dark and under light illumination with different wavelengths to explore the charge transfer in heterojunctions [29,30,40]. The powder was fixed on an FTO conductive glass substrate with a silver paste.…”
Section: Kpfm Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) mounted on the scanning probe microscope (SPM, Dimension Icon, Bruker Nano Inc.) was employed to measure the surface potential in the dark and under light illumination with different wavelengths to explore the charge transfer in heterojunctions [29,30,40]. The powder was fixed on an FTO conductive glass substrate with a silver paste.…”
Section: Kpfm Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, the binding energies of Cu 2p, Ni 2p and Co 2p in heterojunctions shift oppositely in comparison with those in the pure CuO, NiO and Co 3 O 4 . These binding energy variations are attributed to the different electron densities, which are caused by the electron migration across the interface, providing a powerful proof for the heterojunction with strong interfacial interaction rather than a simple physical mixture [25,30,42]. Clearly, the experimental results imply the electrons transfer from CuO to NMTO through the interface of CuO/NMTO heterojunction, while from NMTO to NiO and Co 3 O 4 through the interface of NiO/NMTO and Co 3 O 4 /NMTO heterojunctions, respectively, resulting in built-in electric fields at the heterojunction interfaces [26,28].…”
Section: Charge Transfer In Heterojunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations