2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge transfer in self-assembled monolayers of molecular conductors containing tripodal anchor and terpyridine-metal redox switching element

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also explicitly report the synthesis and characterization of [Co(tpySH)2](PF6)2 (CoSH) for the first time, and demonstrate this complex is air-sensitive in solution. In line with previous observations for SAMs assembled from polypyridyl complexes (see SI, Table S12), 1,22,31,32,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] surface voltammetric analyses indicate that the surface coverage of MSS (and CoSH) SAMs is lower than expected for a close packed structure. This phenomenon has been attributed to unfavorable electrostatic interactions between charged components on the surface.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We also explicitly report the synthesis and characterization of [Co(tpySH)2](PF6)2 (CoSH) for the first time, and demonstrate this complex is air-sensitive in solution. In line with previous observations for SAMs assembled from polypyridyl complexes (see SI, Table S12), 1,22,31,32,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] surface voltammetric analyses indicate that the surface coverage of MSS (and CoSH) SAMs is lower than expected for a close packed structure. This phenomenon has been attributed to unfavorable electrostatic interactions between charged components on the surface.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Namely, during the first potential scan in the positive potential direction, two distinct current peaks were observed; the first peak disappeared upon repeated electrode potential cycling between the negative and positive potential directions, leading to a final steady-state CV, shown in the red color. It has characteristics typical of a 1-electron reversible surface-confined redox system with repulsive interactions between the individual redox-active moieties, meaning that the full width at half maximum of the peak current is larger than 90.6 mV, which is theoretically predicted for non-interacting redox centers in the adsorbed state [ 34 ]. Figure 3 shows the same type of the voltammetric experiment for the Ru-tripod SAM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the main difference between these two films seems to be the molecular arrangement within the SAM structure. The full electrochemical characterization of the final voltammograms on the gold bead electrode has been provided in our previous publication [ 34 ]. In summary, the surface concentration of the Os-tripod film was found to be higher than that of the Ru-tripod SAM; whereas, from the comparison of the full width at half maximum of the peak current, it was concluded that the repulsion interactions are more pronounced in the Ru-tripod SAMs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations