1985
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3700/18/3/021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge transfer in low-energy collisions of N3+, C4+and N5+with H and H2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
48
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated partial and total cross sections are in agreement with the previous low-energy calculations [19,20,26,27,29,30] and the available experimental data [27,39,40]. The recent experimental data [41] for D + C 4+ collisions at low energies are in agreement with the present partial cross section for the excitation of the C 3+ (3p) state.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The calculated partial and total cross sections are in agreement with the previous low-energy calculations [19,20,26,27,29,30] and the available experimental data [27,39,40]. The recent experimental data [41] for D + C 4+ collisions at low energies are in agreement with the present partial cross section for the excitation of the C 3+ (3p) state.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The present calculations are also in agreement with the previous calculations of Ref. [19,20,26,27,29] and the available experimental data for the total cross sections of the charge exchange processes (1) and (2) [27,39,40]. As the example, the experimental data [39] for H + C 4+ collisions are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Dynamicssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is of course possible to move the origin of the entire coordinate system to any point in space without changing the value of a given nonadiabatic coupling matrix element, as confirmed by explicit quantum chemical calculations. 6 However it has been pointed out 3,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13] that in contrast to potentials, nonadiabatic coupling matrix elements have different values for different electron coordinate origins. The ambiguity in the couplings seems to lead to a corresponding ambiguity in the nuclear motion, and this is often regarded as a conceptual shortcoming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%