Charge Transfer Complex betweenO-Phenylenediamine and 2, 3-Dichloro-5, 6-Dicyano-1, 4-Benzoquinone: Synthesis, Spectrophotometric, Characterization, Computational Analysis, and its Biological Applications
Abstract:UV–vis electronic
absorption spectroscopy was used to investigate
the new molecular charge transfer complex (CTC) interaction between
electron donor
O
-phenylenediamine (OPD) and electron
acceptor 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-
p
-benzoquinone
(DDQ). The CTC solution state analysis was carried out by two different
polarities. The stoichiometry of the prepared CTC was determined by
using Job’s, photometric, and conductometric titration methods
and was detemined to be 1:1… Show more
“…For the bipy molecular part, all are deshielded by 1.0, 0.77, and 0.56 ppm. All the NMR spectral data are in support of the formation of H-bonded cocrystal 1 . , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In the case of 13 C NMR the carbon atoms in Figure S4 marked as g , h , i , and j for a phthalic acid molecule having δ values of 169.17, 131.22, 129.12, and 133.34 ppm, respectively, with differences in δ values of 1.57 (deshielded), 1.67 (shielded), 0.72 (deshielded), and 0.45 (shielded) ppm with respect to the phthalic acid molecule. Three other peaks marked as k , l , and m for bipy with δ values of 150.90, 121.64, and 144.85 ppm, respectively, with differences in δ values of 1.10, 0.54, and 0.05 ppm which are all deshielded with respect to the free bipy system is direct evidence for the formation of H-bonded cocrystal 2 . ,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…0.19 ppm (Figure S3), respectively, with respect to the individual free molecular system, giving evidence for the formation of cocrystal 2. 57,56,59 Another notable support for the formation of the cocrystal 2 is the presence of weak signal of a O•••H−N(ring) H-bonded proton at δ = 3.776 ppm. 56,55 Atom integral values show the molecular ratio of phthalic acid and bipy as 1:1, which matches the equivalent ratio of the starting materials.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cocrystal 1 , with reference to Figure S6 a broad absorption band with stretching frequency (ν) 1697 cm –1 (band center) for CO group (marked as a , in Figure S2) of the carboxylic acid group of pyromellitic acid in the cocrystal 1 with respect to sharp intense band at 1712 cm –1 (band center) of the free pyromellitic acid molecule , is evidence of the presence of an H-bonded carbonyl group in the carboxylic acid part of pyromellitic acid. Another important stretching frequency at 3379 cm –1 corresponding to the weak band for a protonated (ring) N + –H bond (H-bonded) and two absorption peaks at 3445 and 3523 cm –1 , respectively, for an H-bonded O–H group and also an intense absorption band of aromatic C–H at 2934–3203 cm –1 of the carboxylic acid part of pyromellitic acid and bipy are strong support for the formation of cocrystal 1 . Very strong evidence for the formation of 1 is the strong absorption band at 2265–2723 cm –1 for the O – ···H–N + (ring) H-bonded fragment between the carboxylic acid group of pyromellitic acid and the N-containing aromatic ring of bipy molecules …”
Organic cocrystals based on H-bonding as well as π-stacking interactions between 4,4′-bipyridine−pyromellitic acid (1) and 4,4′-bipyridine−phthalic acid (2) are reported. Cocrystals 1 and 2 were fully characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction and NMR and IR spectroscopy. The single-crystal X-ray diffraction shows the H stacking pattern of the adjacent 4,4′-bipyridine molecules in the construction of a 3D chain structure for cocrystal 1. Cocrystal 2, however, formed a zigzag 3D chain where the adjacent 4,4′-bipyridyl molecules are involved in a J-stacking mode. Experimental conductivity measurements of the cocrystals 1 and 2 with a Keithley 4200 SCS parameter analyzer showed the temperature-dependent semiconducting behavior in the case of cocrystal 1, whereas cocrystal 2 remained as an insulator. The favorable H-stacking interaction of 4,4′-bipyridine molecules which is the prime origin of semiconductivity in cocrystal 1 may become out of phase due to the free rotation along the C−C bond of 4,4′-bipyridine with an increase in temperature. Although the semiconducting behavior of a material increases with increasing temperature and decreases in resistivity, in the case of cocrystal 1 due to the probable phase transition of the 4,4′-bipyridyl molecules the material became an insulator with an increase in temperature from 20 °C to higher temperature, whereas the semiconducting behavior was restored after cooling the crystals to 20 °C again. The theoretical study conducted with the optimized structures of 1 and 2 showed the higher electron hopping rate in the case of cocrystal 1 as compared to 2 which can account for the charge conduction in the case of 1.
“…For the bipy molecular part, all are deshielded by 1.0, 0.77, and 0.56 ppm. All the NMR spectral data are in support of the formation of H-bonded cocrystal 1 . , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In the case of 13 C NMR the carbon atoms in Figure S4 marked as g , h , i , and j for a phthalic acid molecule having δ values of 169.17, 131.22, 129.12, and 133.34 ppm, respectively, with differences in δ values of 1.57 (deshielded), 1.67 (shielded), 0.72 (deshielded), and 0.45 (shielded) ppm with respect to the phthalic acid molecule. Three other peaks marked as k , l , and m for bipy with δ values of 150.90, 121.64, and 144.85 ppm, respectively, with differences in δ values of 1.10, 0.54, and 0.05 ppm which are all deshielded with respect to the free bipy system is direct evidence for the formation of H-bonded cocrystal 2 . ,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…0.19 ppm (Figure S3), respectively, with respect to the individual free molecular system, giving evidence for the formation of cocrystal 2. 57,56,59 Another notable support for the formation of the cocrystal 2 is the presence of weak signal of a O•••H−N(ring) H-bonded proton at δ = 3.776 ppm. 56,55 Atom integral values show the molecular ratio of phthalic acid and bipy as 1:1, which matches the equivalent ratio of the starting materials.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cocrystal 1 , with reference to Figure S6 a broad absorption band with stretching frequency (ν) 1697 cm –1 (band center) for CO group (marked as a , in Figure S2) of the carboxylic acid group of pyromellitic acid in the cocrystal 1 with respect to sharp intense band at 1712 cm –1 (band center) of the free pyromellitic acid molecule , is evidence of the presence of an H-bonded carbonyl group in the carboxylic acid part of pyromellitic acid. Another important stretching frequency at 3379 cm –1 corresponding to the weak band for a protonated (ring) N + –H bond (H-bonded) and two absorption peaks at 3445 and 3523 cm –1 , respectively, for an H-bonded O–H group and also an intense absorption band of aromatic C–H at 2934–3203 cm –1 of the carboxylic acid part of pyromellitic acid and bipy are strong support for the formation of cocrystal 1 . Very strong evidence for the formation of 1 is the strong absorption band at 2265–2723 cm –1 for the O – ···H–N + (ring) H-bonded fragment between the carboxylic acid group of pyromellitic acid and the N-containing aromatic ring of bipy molecules …”
Organic cocrystals based on H-bonding as well as π-stacking interactions between 4,4′-bipyridine−pyromellitic acid (1) and 4,4′-bipyridine−phthalic acid (2) are reported. Cocrystals 1 and 2 were fully characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction and NMR and IR spectroscopy. The single-crystal X-ray diffraction shows the H stacking pattern of the adjacent 4,4′-bipyridine molecules in the construction of a 3D chain structure for cocrystal 1. Cocrystal 2, however, formed a zigzag 3D chain where the adjacent 4,4′-bipyridyl molecules are involved in a J-stacking mode. Experimental conductivity measurements of the cocrystals 1 and 2 with a Keithley 4200 SCS parameter analyzer showed the temperature-dependent semiconducting behavior in the case of cocrystal 1, whereas cocrystal 2 remained as an insulator. The favorable H-stacking interaction of 4,4′-bipyridine molecules which is the prime origin of semiconductivity in cocrystal 1 may become out of phase due to the free rotation along the C−C bond of 4,4′-bipyridine with an increase in temperature. Although the semiconducting behavior of a material increases with increasing temperature and decreases in resistivity, in the case of cocrystal 1 due to the probable phase transition of the 4,4′-bipyridyl molecules the material became an insulator with an increase in temperature from 20 °C to higher temperature, whereas the semiconducting behavior was restored after cooling the crystals to 20 °C again. The theoretical study conducted with the optimized structures of 1 and 2 showed the higher electron hopping rate in the case of cocrystal 1 as compared to 2 which can account for the charge conduction in the case of 1.
“…The K-value of CB [7]-AMT inclusion complex could be determined by the typical Benesi-Hildebrand equation [19]: 3 Where , are the initial concentrations; A 0 and A are the absorbance of AMT within and without CB [7], respectively; and ε 0 and ε are the molar absorptivity of AMT within and without CB [7],…”
Section: Detection Of Stoichiometry Between Cb[7] and Amtmentioning
Aminopterin (AMT) is a kind of universal antineoplastic drugs, but it has severe toxic and side effects, leaving it rarely used in clinic. Herein, we found that cucurbit [7]uril (CB[7]) and AMT can form stable inclusion complexes, and the formation of CB[7]-AMT 2:1 supramolecular inclusion complex was con rmed by UV-visible absorption spectra, uorescence spectra, and molecular modeling calculations in aqueous solution. Binding stability constants (Ks) were determined by UV-visible and uorescence spectra method, with 1.97 × 105L•mol-1and 2.29 × 105 L•mol-1, respectively. The binding energy was calculated to be 28.8 kcal•mol-1 for the CB[7]-AMT complex. And then, through a series of cell experiments of CCK8 assay, DAPI staining and hoechst33342/PI double staining, we fully proved that the CB[7]-AMT complex can reduce the toxicity of AMT to normal cells such as hepatocyte line LO2, and improve its anticancer effect on cancer cells overexpressing spermine, typically like human colon cancer cell line HCT116. It con rmed that the CB[7]-AMT complex had the effect of reducing toxicity and increasing e ciency. These results indicated that CB[7]-AMTinclusion complex might be a promising novel formulation of AMT for its clinical development.
Abstractπ‐Conjugated polyfluorenes (PPs) comprising 2,3‐diaminobenzene‐1,4‐diyl (unit A) and 9,9‐dihexylfluorene‐2,7‐diyl (polymer‐1) or 9,9‐bis(6‐N,N,N,‐trimethylammoniumhexyl)fluorene‐2,7‐diyl (unit B) (polymer‐2) units were synthesized using Suzuki‐Miyaura coupling polycondensation. To compare the chemical properties and functionality of polymer‐2, a water‐soluble PP comprising benzene‐1,4‐diyl and unit B (polymer‐3) was synthesized. Polymer‐1 exhibited solvatochromism: the photoluminescence (PL) peak of the polymer in solutions shifted to a longer wavelength with an increase in the dielectric constants of solvents. Polymer‐1 formed charge transfer (CT) complexes with organic electron acceptors. The CT complexation behavior was systematically elucidated by the PL measurements using Stern–Volmer and Benesi–Hildebrand methods. Water‐soluble polymer‐2 could be used as a sensor for the chain length of telomere DNA by monitoring the changes in its PL intensity upon the addition of the analyte. The DNA sensing performance of polymer‐2 surpassed that of polymer‐3, attributed to the presence of unit A in polymer‐2. This unit brought polymer‐2 closer to DNA through hydrogen bonding between the amino group of polymer‐2 and nucleic acids in DNA. This interaction facilitated the occurrence of CT from the polymer backbone to DNA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.