2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5079236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge-spin current conversion in high quality epitaxial Fe/Pt systems: Isotropic spin Hall angle along different in-plane crystalline directions

Abstract: We report the growth of MgO[001]//Fe(6 nm)/MgO(7 nm) and MgO[001]//Fe(6 nm)/Pt(6 nm) by molecular beam epitaxy and show that the full characterization by spin-orbit ferromagnetic resonance (SO-FMR) allows the determination of magnetic anisotropies as by classical FMR-only studies. The spin mixing conductance of epitaxial Fe/Pt interface was measured to be 19 ffect

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
17
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, eff SHE is almost constant ( eff SHE = 0.12 ± 0.02 and 0.11 ± 0.02 for J c ⊥ ε and ε = 0, respectively) when J c is not flowing along strain direction. It should be mentioned that the measured eff SHE is larger compared to that reported previously (around 0.05) [20,22,32], and we ascribe this to the presence of the Ta buffer layer, which has a negative spin Hall angle [17,18] thereby also contributing to the spin current density J s . Even if we do not consider the thickness of Ta, the calculated "effective" value involves the contribution of Ta.…”
Section: Strain-enhanced Charge-to-spin Conversioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On the contrary, eff SHE is almost constant ( eff SHE = 0.12 ± 0.02 and 0.11 ± 0.02 for J c ⊥ ε and ε = 0, respectively) when J c is not flowing along strain direction. It should be mentioned that the measured eff SHE is larger compared to that reported previously (around 0.05) [20,22,32], and we ascribe this to the presence of the Ta buffer layer, which has a negative spin Hall angle [17,18] thereby also contributing to the spin current density J s . Even if we do not consider the thickness of Ta, the calculated "effective" value involves the contribution of Ta.…”
Section: Strain-enhanced Charge-to-spin Conversioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Thus, it explains the large value, approximately 0.12, we obtain in our devices without any strain. Similar enhancements of effective values in trilayers have also 044074-4 ), which is reliable only when H res > H sat [32]. (c) Strain dependence of the effective spin Hall angle.…”
Section: Strain-enhanced Charge-to-spin Conversionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The situation is a little more complex in the conversion of charge current to spin current and spin torque by a direct SHE or direct Edelstein effect in spin torque ferromagnetic resonance [12,[29][30][31][32][33] or second harmonic technique experiments [34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. From the interpretation of the data, the experimentalist knows the spin current accommodated by the ferromagnet after coming from the heavy metal through the interface.…”
Section: Charge-to-spin Current Conversion: Spin Hall Effect Vs Ementioning
confidence: 99%