2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.102.028001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge Segregation Depends on Particle Size in Triboelectrically Charged Granular Materials

Abstract: Experiments are carried out to examine triboelectric charging in granular systems composed of particles that are chemically identical but differ in size. A methodology is developed so that only particle-particle interactions (but not particle-wall interactions) contribute to the charging. Since all particles are chemically identical, there is no apparent driving force for charge transfer, but charging occurs nonetheless, such that smaller particles tend to charge negatively while larger particles tend to charg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
113
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
113
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible reason is thought to be the adhesion of fine particles (<40 μm) to coarse particles, which eventually enhance the surface roughness of the coarse particles, similar to the effects of the pattern/ microstructure shown in Table 4. Except for the pure charge (density) analyses, triboelectric series analyses have also been given equal importance [64,70,71]. These experiments and simulations confirm the general trend that large particles tend to charge positively, while small particles tend to charge negatively.…”
Section: Particle Sizesupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A possible reason is thought to be the adhesion of fine particles (<40 μm) to coarse particles, which eventually enhance the surface roughness of the coarse particles, similar to the effects of the pattern/ microstructure shown in Table 4. Except for the pure charge (density) analyses, triboelectric series analyses have also been given equal importance [64,70,71]. These experiments and simulations confirm the general trend that large particles tend to charge positively, while small particles tend to charge negatively.…”
Section: Particle Sizesupporting
confidence: 54%
“…These experiments and simulations confirm the general trend that large particles tend to charge positively, while small particles tend to charge negatively. The theory behind this trend can be summarized from the following several aspects [24,70]. D respectively, will lead to the collision fraction occurring between a large particle and a small particle LS f and give it the form of…”
Section: Particle Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forward et al (2009aForward et al ( , 2009b found, for particles of identical composition, that smaller grains tend to charge negatively and larger grains tend to charge positively. As discussed more extensively in Sect.…”
Section: Tribo-electric Current Generation J Tribomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, they argued that the mass-size dependency involves the collisional transfer of electrons trapped in defect-created meta-states upon contact or rubbing, with the net exchange of electrons statistically favouring the smaller grains due to their increase likelihood of defect region 'rubbing' with larger grains (see Fig. 3 in Forward et al 2009aForward et al , 2009b. In the centre of a convective feature, the grains become stratified in the upward flow of warm air.…”
Section: Tribo-electric Current Generation J Tribomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The difficulties encountered in studies on charge accumulation mainly arise from a large number of factors influencing the process and measurements. These include powder physical properties such as particle size [5][6][7][8] and shape, surface roughness or crystallinity, 9 environmental conditions namely humidity and temperature, [10][11] as well as type of the surface that powder is in contact with. 10 In addition, factors controlling the interaction between the particles and contact surface itself, such as duration of contact, might affect the charge observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%