2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge Percolation Pathways Guided by Defects in Quantum Dot Solids

Abstract: Charge hopping and percolation in quantum dot (QD) solids has been widely studied, but the microscopic nature of the percolation process is not understood or determined. Here we present the first imaging of the charge percolation pathways in two-dimensional PbS QD arrays using Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM). We show that under dark conditions electrons percolate via in-gap states (IGS) instead of the conduction band, while holes percolate via valence band states. This novel transport behavior is explaine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
76
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 A heterogeneous distribution of DOS was observed on measurements over tens of QDs, with about half of them showing IGS. These states are located 0.05À0.1 eV above the Fermi level and 0.15À0.3 eV above the 1S h states (valence band).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 A heterogeneous distribution of DOS was observed on measurements over tens of QDs, with about half of them showing IGS. These states are located 0.05À0.1 eV above the Fermi level and 0.15À0.3 eV above the 1S h states (valence band).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This points to the main difference between the SPS technique and the STS technique: the former is based on electrostatic interactions and only probes the states that can be statically occupied and emptied, while the later is based on the quantum tunneling of electrons and probes a large range of states that electrons can tunnel into/out of. 13,15,33,34 It has been reported that MPA passivates the QD surface more completely than EDT. 7,8,21 Our SPS results on PbS-MPA ( Figure 1B), however, reveal the presence of IGS at nearly the same level as those in the PbS-EDT, indicating that the IGS are not due to incomplete ligand passivation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observation of two distinct distributions may explain why some groups reported states close to the valence level and others associated them with the conduction level. [9][10][11][12][13][14]28] The surface chemistry of PbS CQDs is more complex than simple schemes such as the one in Figure 1a suggest. Even assynthesized CQDs do not only exhibit two differently polarized crystal facets ((001) and (111)), but are also covered with hydroxyl and oleate ions additional to oleic acid.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such defect states were observed for PbS before by various techniques. Reported were especially a state 0.2 eV above the valence level of 1,2-ethanedithiol or 1,3-mercaptopropionic acid (EDT, MPA) capped CQDs via Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) and scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS), [9][10][11][12] Additionally, a quasimetallic midgap band ≈0.4 eV below the conduction …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QDs were treated with 1,2-ethanedithiol (EDT), which replaces the native oleate ligands on the surface, reduces the interparticle distance, and activates charge transport. 12,15,16 Previous work by Nagpal et al indicates that in-gap states (IGS) can assist carrier transport in the EDT treated PbS QD films. 7 Our previous results showed that under dark conditions hole transport occurs via valence band (1S h ) states, while electron transport takes place via IGS (Figure 1b), ∼0.2 eV above the 1S h states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%