2004
DOI: 10.1063/1.1805516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge-on-spring polarizable water models revisited: From water clusters to liquid water to ice

Abstract: The properties of two improved versions of charge-on-spring �COS� polarizable water models (COS/G2 and COS/G3) that explicitly include nonadditive polarization effects are reported. In COS models, the polarization is represented via a self-consistently induced dipole moment consisting of a pair of separated charges. A previous polarizable water model (COS/B2), upon which the improved versions are based, was developed by Yu, Hansson, and van Gunsteren �J. Chem. Phys. 118, 221 �2003��. To improve the COS/B2 mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
235
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
4
235
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the ab initio calculation in which a limited number of minimum energy conformations with significant energy differences have been found for each cluster, the SCCDFTB method determined many more minimum energy conformations, most of which were only slightly different in energies, such as the (H 2 O) 9 cluster shown in Table I. Examining the structures indicated that often those structures differed only by a subtle change of the conformation, e.g., a flipping of a nonhydrogen-bonded O-H bond between the axial and equatorial positions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to the ab initio calculation in which a limited number of minimum energy conformations with significant energy differences have been found for each cluster, the SCCDFTB method determined many more minimum energy conformations, most of which were only slightly different in energies, such as the (H 2 O) 9 cluster shown in Table I. Examining the structures indicated that often those structures differed only by a subtle change of the conformation, e.g., a flipping of a nonhydrogen-bonded O-H bond between the axial and equatorial positions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the SWM4-NDP model, the SWM6 model estimates the binding energies to be less negative than the QM values, as also found for other polarizable models. 16,26 This is attributed to the scaled polarizability and it has been shown that more negative binding energies that are closer to the QM values can be obtained by using the experimental gas phase polarizability in a polarizable model. 26 However, with a smaller scaling factor, smaller deviations from the QM data are found for SWM6 with an average deviation of 2.45 kcal/mol compared to 3.32 kcal/mol for SWM4-NDP.…”
Section: Water Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 To overcome this limitation, polarizable water models that explicitly treat the polarization via different techniques including induced dipoles, fluctuating charges, and the classical Drude oscillator (or Shell model), have been developed in recent years. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] With explicit polarization implemented using the classical Drude oscillator model, [23][24][25] the SWM4-DP (SWM represents "simple water model" and DP represents "Drude polarization") and the subsequent SWM4-NDP model (NDP represents "negative Drude polarization") of water were introduced into the CHARMM family of force fields. 26,27 Targeting four important bulk properties, vaporization enthalpy, density, static dielectric constant, and self-diffusion coefficient, the optimized models were shown to have better performances than additive models and outperform many of the polarizable models available at that time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore it is impossible with three charge models to reproduce simultaneously the melting point and the TMD. It is likely that the inclusion of quantum effects and/or polarizability [246,247,248,249,250,251,252] …”
Section: Hamiltonian Gibbs Duhem Simulations For Watermentioning
confidence: 99%