2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c08263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge-Induced χ(3) Susceptibility in Interfacial Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy Beyond the Bulk Aqueous Contributions: The Case for Silica/Water Interface

Abstract: The electric field induced (EFI) bulk  (3) contribution to the second harmonic generation (SHG) signal from charged interfaces was discovered and applied to study the interfacial chemistry of various charged interfaces three decades ago. For both the buried fused silica/water interface and the exposed charged monolayer covered air/water interface, such bulk  (3) contribution was all attributed to the  (3) term of the polarized water molecules near the charged interfaces. The puzzling experimental observatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
24
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(232 reference statements)
3
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the nonresonant SHG signal contains contributions from all polarizable species including interfacial silanol groups, water, the ions, and protonated and deprotonated surface sites, whereas our vibrational SFG measurements only probe OH oscillators. 60,73,90 Nevertheless, the HD-SHG measurements allow us to predict how the error phase changes between our two reference points (i.e. pH 6 and pH 2) (Fig.…”
Section: 𝑑𝑧mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the nonresonant SHG signal contains contributions from all polarizable species including interfacial silanol groups, water, the ions, and protonated and deprotonated surface sites, whereas our vibrational SFG measurements only probe OH oscillators. 60,73,90 Nevertheless, the HD-SHG measurements allow us to predict how the error phase changes between our two reference points (i.e. pH 6 and pH 2) (Fig.…”
Section: 𝑑𝑧mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the wave vector mismatch for the reflection geometries commonly used in most SFG setups is on the order of 10 2 nm -1 , leading to third-order (bulk allowed) contributions that add to the second-order (interface-specific) SFG response depending on the interfacial potential. [54][55][56][57][58][59][60] While it has been known for a while how these second-and third-order contributions are encoded in the total detected SFG signal, [61][62] the proper lineshape analysis requires knowledge of the phase relationship between these two terms and the total interfacial potential, which has remained elusive. To overcome this problem, we now combine vibrational sum frequency, nonresonant heterodyne-detected second harmonic generation (HD-SHG), and streaming potential measurements to obtain the interface-specific response for the fused silica/water interface as a function of pH and a total ionic strength of 50 mM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the nonresonant SHG signal contains contributions from all polarizable species including interfacial silanol groups, water, the ions, and protonated and deprotonated surface sites, whereas our vibrational SFG measurements only probe OH oscillators. 61,74,91 Nevertheless, the HD-SHG measurements allow us to predict how the error phase changes between our two reference points (i.e. pH 6 and pH 2) (Fig.…”
Section: 𝑑𝑧mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the wave vector mismatch for the reflection geometries commonly used in most SFG setups is on the order of 10 2 nm -1 , leading to third-order (bulk allowed) contributions that add to the second-order (interface-specific) SFG response depending on the interfacial potential. [55][56][57][58][59][60][61] While it has been known for a while how these second-and third-order contributions are encoded in the total detected SFG signal, [62][63] the proper lineshape analysis requires knowledge of the phase relationship between these two terms and the total interfacial potential, which has remained elusive. To overcome this problem, we now combine vibrational sum frequency, nonresonant heterodyne-detected second harmonic generation (HD-SHG), and streaming potential measurements to obtain the interface-specific response for the fused silica/water interface as a function of pH and a total ionic strength of 50 mM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the wave vector mismatch for the reflection geometries commonly used in most SFG setups is on the order of 10 2 nm -1 , leading to third-order (bulk allowed) contributions that add to the second-order (interface-specific) SFG response depending on the interfacial potential. [49][50][51][52][53][54][55] While it has been known for a while how these second-and third-order contributions are encoded in the total detected SFG signal, [56][57] the proper lineshape analysis requires knowledge of the phase relationship between these two terms and the total interfacial potential, which has remained elusive. To overcome this problem, we now combine vibrational sum frequency, nonresonant heterodyne-detected second harmonic generation (HD-SHG), and streaming potential measurements to obtain the interface-specific response for the fused silica/water interface as a function of pH and a total ionic strength of 50 mM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%